Earlier this week, we reported on a county commission in Tennessee that declined to issue a strongly worded statement in response to a detective who delivered a sermon at his church earlier this month that called for the execution of members of the LGBTQ community.
An Open Letter to Knox County Sheriff's Detective Grayson Fritts
According to Knox News, Detective Grayson Fritts—who is also a pastor at a local church—delivered a sermon in early June in which he said that the government should execute members of the LGBTQ community. You read that right—he called for state-sanctioned mass-murder of an entire population of people. His comments were reprehensible and anathema to the oath LEOs take to protect and serve their communities.

According to Knox News, Knox County (TN) Sheriff's Detective Grayson Fritts—who is also a pastor at a local church—delivered a sermon in early June in which he said that the government should execute members of the LGBTQ community.
When I first came across that news item, my immediate thought was, "No way. That cannot be true. No cop would think that, much less say it out loud in front of a congregation of people."
So I did what any good reporter would do and found other sources confirming the recent report—there were previous articles detailing the incident.
According to what I was able to glean, Fritts delivered an hour-long sermon in which he called for federal, state, and county governments to arrest, try, convict, and "speedily" execute people within the LGBTQ community.
The church reportedly posted the sermon to YouTube but that video has since been deleted for violating YouTubes's hate speech policy.
After reading about the fact that a video existed, I wanted to see it for myself, but I also knew that seeing it would infuriate me further, so it's probably for the best that it was gone by the time I learned of it.
The county commission failed to issue a statement on the matter.
I won't make that same mistake.
Following a brief preamble, you can read my open letter to Mr. Fritts, followed by some final thoughts about LGBTQ individuals on the Thin Blue Line.
Straight Scribe Supporting LGBTQ
I'm as straight as any American male can be—I have not the least bit of interest in a relationship with another man other than friendship and/or brotherhood.
I like women—a lot—and don't get the attraction to men.
But I don't begrudge or belittle a man's love for another man, nor do I dismiss or diminish a woman's desire to be with another woman.
I sincerely don't care, because your bedroom activities have zero effect on my life.
You do you.
I live in the Center of the Universe for the LGBTQ community—the Castro District in San Francisco.
My house is the only structure on my street with an American flag on display—every other flag is the rainbow flag signifying Gay Pride.
I look at that American flag in my window proudly—and I use that word "proud" with purpose and intention—knowing that myriad soldiers fought and died so that the men and women who have different sexual preferences can exercise their freedoms.
American freedoms were established in the Declaration of Independence, the signing of which we will be celebrating in the next few weeks.
That document reads:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Life.
Liberty.
Happiness.
Those words mean the world to me.
Those words apply to every American citizen, including members of the LGBTQ community.
An Open Letter
To Knox County Sheriff's Detective Grayson Fritts,
I get it—your religious beliefs oppose homosexuality.
I have many Christian friends who don't approve of same-sex stuff—whether that is gay marriage or other "non-traditional" relationships.
I get it. You're a preacher in a church in your off-time, and have a pulpit from which you can say anything you wish.
That's your First Amendment right, as I wrote last week about police officers' social media posts.
But calling for the death of any individual—much less a whole population of people—simply for their sexual orientation is unconscionable.
Mr. Fritts, you swore an oath to the Constitution of the United States of America, and in your statements—albeit off-duty—you violated that oath.
You don't belong in the sworn ranks.
You have no Constitutional protection ensuring your employment as a law enforcement officer, and you don't deserve to be among the protectors of our citizens.
As it stands, you have been removed from duty and your contract has been bought out.
Not good enough for me.
You should be stripped of your law enforcement status.
You don't belong on the Thin Blue Line.
You don't belong anywhere near it.
Your statements were unacceptable and inconsistent with the oath to protect and serve your community.
Your statements were anathema to what every cop I know—and I know hundreds of cops—stands for.
Those guys and gals stand for serving and protecting EVERYONE.
You, sir, clearly, do not.
You do not represent the overwhelming majority of law enforcement officers who in the commission of their duties sincerely do not see color, creed, sexual preference, or any other label.
They see only people who are suspected of committing a crime, or people who were the victim of a crime, or were witnesses to a crime.
I don't trust you to do the same.
The LEOs I know don't want a whole group of the American population to be executed for who they love or are attracted to romantically or sexually. Like me, they may not understand the attraction. They may not approve of it for religious reasons. But they're not calling for state-sanctioned mass-murder.
Those officers and deputies deserve better than what you said.
Calling for the deaths of individuals based on their sexual orientation is—in my opinion—cause for immediate and permanent dismissal from the ranks.
Good day, sir.
Final Words
I have numerous gay and lesbian LEO friends. It's encouraging that—now that modern, mature thinking has taken root—they don't seem to get as much "flack" from fellow-officers for being who they are.
Perhaps that perception is a function of living and working in the San Francisco Bay Area. I'd like to think it's more about expanding open-mindedness across the country, but regardless, I see the imminent demise of intolerance of LGBTQ officers.
I see increasing acceptance.
I see more appreciation of the "why" someone does the job, and not the "who" of the men and women who put their lives on the line every tour.
I see men and women who have purpose and persistence on every shift, regardless of sexual orientation.
Next week marks the 50-year anniversary of the Stonewall Riots in New York City—not the best moment for police interaction with the gay community.
In fact, it was awful.
But a half century later, the profession has matured, advanced, and improved.
Uniformed police officers now march in annual Gay Pride Parades—something that would be unheard-of in 1969.
Those officers show—without a shadow of a doubt—that they are heroes to their communities, especially to young people in the LGBTQ community who dream of serving and protecting.
The profession has come a long way since Stonewall.
But statements from people like Knox County Sheriff's Detective Grayson Fritts show that we have some way to go.
Let's go.
More Blogposts
Preventing Heat Injury in Police K-9s
In the relentless heat of summer and even early fall in some parts of the country, officers face the important task of protecting their K-9 partners while working in sweltering temperatures. Recognizing changes in a dog’s behavior is the key.
Read More →Why Your Agency Needs to Attend the ILEETA Conference
ILEETA is a complete resource for trainers to address trainers' needs. Its mission is to enhance the skills and safety of criminal justice practitioners while fostering stronger and safer communities.
Read More →IACP 2023: New Training Products
Technologies for improving law enforcement training and training management were some of the highlights at this year's show.
Read More →Initial Results Released from MSP 2024 Police Vehicle Testing
The 2024 pursuit-rated vehicles--all pickup trucks or SUVs, including two battery electric models the Chevrolet Blazer EV AWD and Ford Mustang Mach-E--were put through their paces.
Read More →Officer Safety Considerations Related to Alternative-Fuel Vehicles
As more alternative-fuel and hybrid vehicles hit the road, police and other first responders need to understand that they are no more dangerous than conventional vehicles. However, there are certain safety considerations every cop should know.
Read More →Garmont Working to Grow LE Market Presence
Garmont Tactical has found wide acceptance by military boot buyers, but now the company is trying to better respond to the needs of police officers. Many cops now are not fans of 8-inch boots, so Garmont is adapting.
Read More →Publisher’s Note: Our Commitment to You
Through our magazine and website and our Police Technology eXchange event, we promise to provide you with information and access to resources to help you do your job safer and better.
Read More →10 Tips for Responding to Mental Health Crisis Calls
The Harris County Sheriff's Office is a model for other agencies that want to learn about crisis intervention and mental health crisis response. Sgt. Jose Gomez shares the story of their programs and provides 10 tips for mental health crisis call response
Read More →5 Things to Know When Buying Concealed-Carry or Off-Duty Holsters
Mike Barham, of Galco Holsters, shares five important considerations to keep in mind when you buy off-duty concealed or plain-clothes carry holsters.
Read More →10 Tips for Reviewing Use-of-Force Reports
While the burden of accurately reporting use-of-force situations is on an individual deputy or officer, the person reviewing those reports shares in the responsibility of making sure the reporting is done properly, with clear details included.
Read More →









