However, a leading civil rights attorney and author discounted the claim. Norm Pattis, a trial attorney and legal commentator, told POLICE Magazine the program was a legitimate counter-terrorism initiative.
"This doesn't strike me as harassment of the Muslim community," Pattis said. "I don't think gathering information should be aginst the law. In general, I think this is a smart application of community policing."
The ACLU claims FBI agents in San Francisco recorded identities of Muslim religious leaders and congregants, personal information, and religious views and practices. The FBI labeled this information as "positive intelligence" and disseminated it to other government agencies. The distribution placed the people and organizations involved "at risk of greater law enforcement scrutiny as potential national security threats," according to the group.
The information was collectd openly, but individuals weren't aware it would be distributed, according to the group.
"Everyone understands that the FBI has a job to do, but it is wrong and counterproductive for the bureau to target American Muslim religious groups for secret intelligence gathering and place innocents at risk of investigation as national security threats," said Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project. "The FBI is casting a cloud of suspicion on American Muslim religious organizations based on their faith alone, which raises grave constitutional concerns."