That being said, the jury found that he was criminally negligent in that effort in that
he didn't reasonably follow policy or training
. Let's analyze three key areas of my testimony that officers and trainers ought to consider:
First, a TASER is sometimes used in imminent deadly force scenarios. Many lives have been saved, but sometimes officers are hurt in the process. It is important to do this as safely as possible.
Second, there have been six prior weapon-confusion cases in the past nine years where an officer shot someone while intending to use his or her TASER.
And third, it is essential that trainers put officers through their paces with training that is dynamic, stress-inducing, and requires officers to make quick force-options decisions. The training must truly test the officer's ability to be ready for stressful encounters on the street.
As a common thread of all six weapon-confusion cases, the officer's strong hand was involved. Therefore, consider requiring an officer's
TASER
to be in weak-side holsters requring a weak-hand draw to reduce the possibility of another tragic case. Dr. Bill Lewinski (Force Science Research Center) and I have discussed this issue, and we believe that it would signfiicantly reduce the risk of having a weapon-confusion incident.