While some of our fine sheriffs are indeed appointed, 99 percent are elected by the people. That direct responsibility to the electorate protects the populace from undue political influence by members of a county's board, supervisors, council, etc., on local law enforcement. Moreover, there are a number of checks and balances imposed on the discretion of any given sheriff. Local voters can remove him or her from office through the electoral process or by special referendum. In extreme cases, various state statutes authorize the direct removal of a sheriff for malfeasance of duty while in office.
I submit Mr. Griffith's characterizations are misinformed and misguided. The fallacy of his argument rests with his assertion that appointing law enforcement executives somehow protects against incompetency, mismanagement, or corruption. It is not difficult to cite countless examples of appalling, outrageous misconduct by appointed law enforcement CEOs and from those incidents then draw the unwarranted conclusion that the transgression stems from the fact that the leaders are appointed. In truth, there are many more committed and dedicated men and women serving as sheriffs, police chiefs, directors, etc., across the country today than in any point in history. Knee-jerk reactions, broad brush generalizations, and oversimplifications only serve to perpetuate baseless or poorly reasoned assertions.
The isolated, "extremes cases" cited by Mr. Griffith as the basis of his argument are exceptionally few and far between. Even more relevant is the fact that those respective individuals mentioned were held accountable by the criminal justice system and/or the electorate. Going a step further, let's use real-time examples, not illustrations from a decade ago. Less than one percent of sheriffs in this country were charged or otherwise shamed from their offices in 2007. That means more than 99 percent did what the people elected them to do: protect their families, house their criminals, and collect the taxes that keep their communities going.
While we often lament the news media's focus on bad news, the climate was obviously similar when Thomas Jefferson said, "History, in general, only informs us of what bad government is." An honest examination of the men and women serving as sheriffs would reveal thousands of stories of selfless dedication and unparalleled leadership. I would ask Mr. Griffith to examine the careers of simple, committed men like Sheriff Leo Samaniego of El Paso, whose focus on truth and integrity led that agency out of the bowels of disgrace.
No election, not even one in which the incumbent is unchallenged, is perfect. There will always be someone unhappy with the results. But Americans have resoundingly said over the centuries that the electoral process is a fair way to gauge their voice. The National Sheriffs' Association agrees and will continue to defend the men and women chosen to protect and serve when they are honorable, and to ensure those who cross legal and ethical boundaries are held accountable.
Sheriff Craig Webre, president of the National Sheriffs' Association, is a lifelong resident of Lafourche Parish, La., and was recently elected to a fifth term. Webre has served his community as an officer with the Thibodaux Police Department, the Lafourche Parish Sheriff's Office, and as a Louisiana State Trooper.
