What if we suited up Sharpton, Clinton, biased reporters, and other "experts" on police tactics, and sent them into the funhouse? I would expect that exposing them to a medium level risk scenario would result in their emptying their Simunition weapons…and perhaps their bowels. There is no better way to understand the risks officers are confronted with than running through realistic scenario-based training.
After the 1999 shooting incident with Amadou Diallo and NYPD Officers, law enforcement trainers began to integrate language barrier challenges into scenario training. Trainers also created low-light scenarios where non-compliant subjects reached for keys or wallets after being told to keep their hands in the air. What we all learned from this training was we didn't want to be in the shoes of the officers in these incidents. It is tragic that Diallo died, but we learned the risk factors that led to the shooting were real and the officers' actions were not racially motivated.
Absent his having any experience walking in the shoes of an officer, former President Clinton made this alarming statement on Dec. 12 during an interview with CNN: "There is not any question in Ferguson, whatever the findings of the Grand Jury, if the law enforcement officer had not gone after the man and felt compelled to shoot him, he would be alive." Aside from his alarming dismissal of a grand jury decision, the former president asserts his suspect expertise in tactical matters by concluding Officer Wilson arbitrarily pursued and shot the subject. Conspicuous in their absence from Clinton's remarks are: no threat assessment and no consideration of the risk factors and a totality of the variables. So what we get is just a judgment from a former president in desperate need of scenario-based training.
Drawing upon the theme of the recent Ice-Bucket Challenges, I'd like to issue a Training Challenge to Sharpton, Clinton, the biased news media, and all the self-righteous critics of law enforcement. The challenge would include a comprehensive briefing on the use-of-force continuum, and several low risk walk-throughs to teach them the basics. There would be no ambush scenarios, even though law enforcement is subject to them. Instead, they'd be suited up in full protective gear, with Simunition weapons and handcuffs, and exposed to low- to medium-risk scenarios.
Undoubtedly, they would fail to issue strong verbal commands. They would fail to make the proper sequencing of threat assessments. They would fail to assess the risk presented by their surroundings. They would fail to employ proper tactics or the appropriate level of force. In short, they would fail. This is understandable because we all know you can't manufacture experienced officers by running them through one day of scenario-based training. However, they would walk away with insight and perhaps new-found respect for the risks that confront law enforcement officers. And these risks do not include anyone's skin color.
