The purpose of the EMJ study is to not only deliver some righteous liberal criticism of cops but also to establish another layer of bureaucracy that ER docs have to cope with. That's what that whole management of cases thing is about. The authors apparently want hospitals to establish suspected excessive force reporting like the suspected domestic abuse reporting they already have in place. Docs will love that. It's just what they need, more social work.
And there are so many problems with this survey that I don't even know where to begin.
First and foremost, how can an emergency room doctor unilaterally decide after the fact that a cop used excessive force? "Excessive force" is a legal concept based on numerous Supreme Court rulings on civil rights cases. Key among these is
Graham v. Connor
, which establishes that police have the right to use objectively reasonable force to counter a threat or even a perceived threat. That term objectively reasonable is tricky; it can only be determined in a court of law whether an act is objectively "reasonable."
Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, summed up this concern when he told USA Today that ER doctors "have no way of knowing what amount of force was required" in encounters with suspects.
Another major problem with the paper is that the authors are really making an apple and orange argument. There's a reason why doctors are asked to step in when they suspect domestic abuse, elderly abuse, child abuse: The victims are known to be cowed into silence by their abusers. The same cannot be said of subjects arrested by police. The first words out of their mouths are "excessive force." The next words are: "I'm gonna sue." And there are plenty of attorneys to take their cases. So there's no reason for doctors to be asked to play social worker in such cases.
Last month our associate editor
Dean Scoville
shot back at the EMJ study with an article titled
"Medical Diagnosis: We Suck!"
on the
Patrol Channel
at PoliceMag.com. Dean's article was also picked up by a blog called GruntDoc.com, established by a Texas-based emergency room physician and former Marine combat surgeon. And the response of GruntDoc's audience revealed two things that I urge you to remember about this topic:
One, there are a lot of really good docs out there who think the medical academics who authored the EMJ report have their heads in their posteriors. Two, there's no reason for you to think ill of them. They know that you are the good guys and that you're both on the same team.
But why don't I let them speak for themselves:
Whitecoat wrote: "Just so you know, this article does not reflect the feelings of most emergency physicians. I bet that if you asked just about any healthcare provider to define what "excessive force" even means, they couldn't do it. If you are protecting your life or the lives of others, you do what you need to do. We put drunk patients into four-point leather restraints in the emergency department; would those same physicians answering the survey consider that treatment as "excessive" as well? I'm sure the study was worded in such a way that the researchers were able to get the answers they wanted. Emergency workers have no idea what you guys go through in the field…Peace."
DocV wrote: "Please know that not all of us feel this way. My father was a LEO and I have a tremendous amount of respect for the "Thin Blue Line" and all that you do. Please go out and read the discussion of this on some of the emergency medicine blogs. You'll find many more docs that are on your side. Thank you for your service."
