Now, to be fair, 12 percent of you would like to see tighter gun laws. Those of you in this camp believe that restricting gun ownership would reduce gun crime and tragic gun accidents.
However, the vast majority of you believe that restricting gun ownership would only take guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens. In other words, criminals would still find a way to acquire hand cannons and John Q. Citizen would be disarmed.
I have to admit, we kinda expected these results. But I will also swear on any number of Bibles that we did nothing to cook this survey. It is what it is, and it is the unvarnished truth.
How valid is our survey? Well, let’s take a look at the numbers. The best estimate is that there are 1 million sworn (give or take 200K) law enforcement officers in the United States. So that begs the question: Can 1,572 officers out of a pool of 8,794 really speak for them all?
Statistically, yes. Hey, if 10,000 Nielsen families can determine what the other 300 million Americans get to watch on TV and the profit-and-loss statements of the major networks, then 1,572 cops can speak for a population of slightly more than a million other LEOs. And I’ll make this challenge to anyone who disputes our finding: Poll your own diverse population of 8,794 cops from all ranks and all types of agencies and see if you get different results.