And I was pleasantly surprised when my first group had five Remington Golden Sabers in 32 millimeters, printing dead on to point of aim. Of the nine groups I fired none was larger than 64 millimeters, which I feel is impressive accuracy from a pistol of this class. Like many of the 9mm caliber pistols I've tested, it showed a preference for heavier projectiles, and the groups consistently shrank as the bullet weight increased.
After chronographing the three brands of ammo, the next chore was to see how the G42 handled some offhand combat drills at five meters. The trigger displayed a bit of "new gun" stiffness, which I'm sure will smooth out with use. I also found the sights a bit difficult to use. My personal preference is for a fiber optic front sight, which more and more manufacturers are now either fitting to their pistols or offering as an option, and I would like to see Glock follow this trend. Recoil was quite mild, but the short grip allowed the pistol to move around in my hand, forcing me to re-grasp it after every few shots.
All of the rounds I sent downrange ended up in the appropriate parts of the targets, with the majority of them chewing a ragged hole in the red 10 ring. I did not experience a single failure to feed, fire, or cycle out of the more than 250 rounds I fired from the G42 in two shooting sessions.
While I found the Glock 42 a very practical pistol for concealed carry, I would like to suggest one additional feature that would make it even better. An extended magazine base plate with a finger rest would allow a full, three-finger grip, which would provide a more secure purchase and improved recoil control without compromising concealability. Actually when you think about it an optional extended magazine would provide the same benefits along with one or two more rounds of ammunition.
Paul Scarlata has served as an auxiliary police officer and is a frequent contributor to POLICE Magazine.