Most of us were taught from a very young age that it is wrong to kill another human being. Then in the police academy, we were slowly conditioned to accept that, under some circumstances, we might have to use deadly force. To reinforce that conditioning, we were sent to the shooting range and told, “When the target turns and faces, you will draw, and fire two rounds.”This, we learned, was to be our response to a life-threatening situation.
But the police sniper is faced with a different situation. In most cases, he sits in a hide, undetected by his potential target. From this position of relative safety, the sniper observes his target, perhaps for hours, creating a unique level of intimacy between the target and the sniper. Then if the situation dictates, the sniper will put his crosshairs on this individual and put a bullet between his or her eyes.
Not everyone is capable of the emotional detachment necessary to kill another human being in such a premeditated fashion. The ability and willingness to do so requires the sniper to work through a number of ethical, legal, and moral issues. Still, even in the face of extreme danger, some people can’t kill. And they should never be police sniper candidates.
The only person who can provide an answer to the question, “Will you kill?”is the sniper candidate himself. Self-examination and honesty now are of the utmost importance. Looking through your scope at a living target, with the lives of others in the balance, is not the time to finally admit to yourself that the answer is, “No, I can’t do it.”[PAGEBREAK]
An inability to kill in this fashion should not be looked upon as a reflection on the officer’s manhood or ability as a tactical team member. It simply means that he is not a good sniper candidate.