Retired Lt. Pete Ebel talks about how to train officers to be prepared for an ambush while leading a session at ILEETA’s annual conference in St. Louis, Missouri.Wayne Parham
When an officer is ambushed and under the threat of being killed, what would he or she do to survive?
That was a question posed by Retired Lt. Pete Ebel while teaching “Building You Agency’s Counter Ambush Program” earlier this week during the International Association of Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association’s annual conference this week in St. Lous, Missouri.
“To me, honestly, one of the things that we ought to be doing is incorporating counter ambush training in our in-service and yearly training,” said Ebel, who served 19 years with the Lake Worth Police Department and then 14 years with the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office. “You don't have to do a special counter-ambush class and name it that guys, we ought to be creating a mindset in the agency.”
Ebel defined an ambush as “An attack in which the aggressor, or aggressors, take advantage of concealment and the element of surprise to engage an unsuspecting opponent.”
He pointed out that the International Association of Chiefs of Police breaks ambushes into two types:
- Deliberate or entrapment ambushes
- Impromptu ambushes
Citing more IACP data, Ebel said from 1990 to 2012, 68% of ambushes were spontaneous and only 32% were entrapment.
Ebel shared that most studies and reports about ambushes on officers are older, typically written between 2010 and 2015. However, the National Fraternal Order of Police compiles data on the number of officers shot. Within that report, updated monthly, ambush attacks are noted.
According to the FOP report detailing shootings of officers in 2023, 378 officers were shot. That was the highest number ever reported by the FOP in a single year. The same report said there were 115 ambush-style attacks on officers in 2023, resulting in 138 officers being shot and 20 killed.
4 Factors of an Ambush
The veteran lawman and trainer detailed four factors for an ambush, starting with the element of surprise. He explained the element of surprise is the most important component of an attacker’s success.
Why? Because it puts officers off balance and can leave them confused plus it keeps the officers guessing and can force them to make mistakes, he said.
Another key element is concealment. With that, Ebel means concealment of the assailant, their intentions, and any weapons.
The third factor is the suddenness of the attack because Ebel said that destroys officer morale and a smaller number of assailants can succeed.
The final factor, according to Ebel, is lack of provocation.
What else, according to Ebel, will get officers killed in an ambush?
- Complacency
- Hesitancy
- Lack of Situational Awareness
- Lack of proper training – dynamic scenarios are needed.
Duty of Instructors to Teach the Proper Mindset
Ebel pointed out how instructors, and experienced officers as well, have to take the lead in teaching the proper mindset to fellow officers, in particular ones from the younger generations.
Officers must understand that anything is fair during a fight for their lives, so trainers must teach officers how to have the will to win at any cost.
“No matter what, I tell people all the time when I start talking about mindset, a battle to live is never pretty,” he added.
Ebel suggests a key question for trainers to use.
“What are you willing to do to win?”
In recent years the profession has focused training and attention on de-escalation, but once an officer is under threat of serious harm or death, it is time to fight.
“Some of these kids, you start talking about the warrior mentality to them, what happens? The wall goes up. ‘Well, you know, they told us in the academy warrior is a dirty word.’ I'm here to tell you, some maniac’s killing kids in a classroom somewhere you want a warrior, or you want a security guard?” said Ebel.
He also noted that many of the younger generation cops have never been in a fight in their life, until they hit the streets. They need to be prepared and learn the tenacity to survive. They need to be taught the mindset.
Ebel also suggested visualization as a tool to prepare officers to withstand an ambush.
“Visualization works. I've been doing it since I played high school sports,” said Ebel. “I was taught by a really good wrestling coach.”
That coach impressed upon a young Ebel to take 10 minutes to practice visualization before walking out and hitting the mat. That time was spent visualizing a difficult predicament and what he would have to do to work out of it.
“We chase people, we fight people,” added Ebel, translating the concept to the law enforcement world.
Teaching officers how to visualize that in advance and plan how they will react, what they will do, and how they will survive and overcome, are all important, he explained.
“We’ve got to get them to perform under those circumstances. The body won't go where the mind doesn’t,” he explained. “Visualization will help overcome fear.”
Situational Awareness
Ebel suggests if a situation an officer encounters a situation that doesn’t feel right, it likely is not.
Scan the area and formulate a tactical response to an attack, know an escape route, and recognize ambush points.
Look for pre-attack indicators. Watch the body language, eye contact, and verbal cues.
Also, trainers need to make sure officers are taught to watch for concealed weapons, in particular when making traffic stops.
Indicators of an armed person presented by Ebel included:
- Bulges
- Security pats and adjustments
- Pulling up the pants
- Swinging pocket in jacket
- Shoulder dips in a vehicle
- Looking around before stopping
The veteran lawman shared ample examples of how officers do not always have the needed situational awareness and do not constantly scan the 5-foot and 25-foot range.
Even with his previous agencies, he sometimes would walk into an establishment, stand in place, and not even be spotted by lower-ranking officers who should have kept an eye on the door and recognized him. The point he drove home was anyone, even armed bad guys, could have walked up on the officers who were not constantly scanning their environment.
Officer Greg Thudium, lead training officer at the Chandler Police Department, answers a few questions after leading “Officer Survivability in the Kill Zone,” one of many sessions at ILEETA 2024.Wayne Parham
Officer Survivability in the Kill Zone
In a separate training session, Officer Greg Thudium, lead training officer at the Chandler Police Department (AZ), taught “Officer Survivability in the Kill Zone.” He has 15 years of SWAT service and is the SWAT instructor. The ultimate goal of the course was to help officers win a violent encounter.
Thudium looked at five or six major cities and reviewed the data that involved officer shootings and critical incidents. When he did that, he spotted patterns that provided insight into what happens during these shootings, regardless of the size of the agency or location.
From that, he found key things that were in common across all the shootings that helped increase officer survivability. Some of those are:
- Properly using cover and proper movement
- Getting your gun into the fight
- Wearing the proper equipment, including a ballistic vest
- Interpreting threat cues
Thudium said he wanted the attendees to take back ways they could modify training based on this knowledge. A good example of doing that is when it comes time to head to the range.
“Why are we shooting at 25 yards when we're literally getting in gunfights at 12 feet, that's the majority of them across the country,” Thudium explained. “So, we need to be training cops to be shooting at close distance. We need to train them to move. We need to be training them to understand distances and conflict resolution tactics and things that we know are actually going to help them in the fight.”
