Unfortunately, law enforcement faces a conundrum when it comes to the prospect of dealing with looters: If we use force and show an assertive law enforcement presence, will we later be accused of escalating the situation? If we don't, will we be prepared to deal with accusations of ineptitude and cowardice by business owners and residents for not acting to save their property?
It's pretty common for some officers to assume that an agency's indecisiveness in the face of such diabolical choices is a result of administrative cowardice. But Richard Odenthal, a retired law enforcement veteran who trains on civil disorder management, believes the situation is more complicated than that.
"First, you need to have a clear-cut mission," Odenthal explains, saying that everyone needs to know what they are trying to accomplish and how they are going to do it. "Next, you have to have sufficient training, personnel, and logistics to carry out that mission. Finally, you have to have administrators who will stand by the mission that they developed. From the very top on down, everyone has to be on the same page. If you don't have that kind of commitment up and down the food chain, people will be hesitant to carry out their missions."
Deadly Exaggerations
Lee Clarke, a professor at Rutgers University and the author of "Worst Cases, A History of Disasters," says the biggest factor in a police agency's ability to prevent or quell looting is having a general knowledge of how people respond to disasters.