Professional Courtesy
There are a lot of really good docs out there who think the medical academics who authored the EMJ report have their heads in their posteriors.
It was kind of the coal in the Christmas stocking of every American police officer. During the holidays, a story broke in newspapers around the country that 98 percent of American emergency room doctors suspect patients have been "victims of excessive force by police."
These reports were triggered by a survey of 315 ER physicians published in the January edition of Emergency Medicine Journal (EMJ). The survey conducted in 2002 and helmed by Dr. H. Range Hutson of Harvard asked the docs whether they had treated a patient with injuries that they suspected were caused by police excessive force. It also asked if the respondents had received training in managing such cases.
The purpose of the EMJ study is to not only deliver some righteous liberal criticism of cops but also to establish another layer of bureaucracy that ER docs have to cope with. That's what that whole management of cases thing is about. The authors apparently want hospitals to establish suspected excessive force reporting like the suspected domestic abuse reporting they already have in place. Docs will love that. It's just what they need, more social work.
And there are so many problems with this survey that I don't even know where to begin.
First and foremost, how can an emergency room doctor unilaterally decide after the fact that a cop used excessive force? "Excessive force" is a legal concept based on numerous Supreme Court rulings on civil rights cases. Key among these is Graham v. Connor, which establishes that police have the right to use objectively reasonable force to counter a threat or even a perceived threat. That term objectively reasonable is tricky; it can only be determined in a court of law whether an act is objectively "reasonable."
Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police, summed up this concern when he told USA Today that ER doctors "have no way of knowing what amount of force was required" in encounters with suspects.
Another major problem with the paper is that the authors are really making an apple and orange argument. There's a reason why doctors are asked to step in when they suspect domestic abuse, elderly abuse, child abuse: The victims are known to be cowed into silence by their abusers. The same cannot be said of subjects arrested by police. The first words out of their mouths are "excessive force." The next words are: "I'm gonna sue." And there are plenty of attorneys to take their cases. So there's no reason for doctors to be asked to play social worker in such cases.
Last month our associate editor Dean Scoville shot back at the EMJ study with an article titled "Medical Diagnosis: We Suck!" on the Patrol Channel at PoliceMag.com. Dean's article was also picked up by a blog called GruntDoc.com, established by a Texas-based emergency room physician and former Marine combat surgeon. And the response of GruntDoc's audience revealed two things that I urge you to remember about this topic:
One, there are a lot of really good docs out there who think the medical academics who authored the EMJ report have their heads in their posteriors. Two, there's no reason for you to think ill of them. They know that you are the good guys and that you're both on the same team.
But why don't I let them speak for themselves:
Whitecoat wrote: "Just so you know, this article does not reflect the feelings of most emergency physicians. I bet that if you asked just about any healthcare provider to define what "excessive force" even means, they couldn't do it. If you are protecting your life or the lives of others, you do what you need to do. We put drunk patients into four-point leather restraints in the emergency department; would those same physicians answering the survey consider that treatment as "excessive" as well? I'm sure the study was worded in such a way that the researchers were able to get the answers they wanted. Emergency workers have no idea what you guys go through in the field…Peace."
DocV wrote: "Please know that not all of us feel this way. My father was a LEO and I have a tremendous amount of respect for the "Thin Blue Line" and all that you do. Please go out and read the discussion of this on some of the emergency medicine blogs. You'll find many more docs that are on your side. Thank you for your service."
More Patrol

Why Tennessee’s New Deadly Force Law Matters Beyond Tennessee
Tennessee’s new deadly force law is more limited than many may realize. Effective July 1, 2026, the law applies to a person who is not engaged in conduct that would constitute a felony or a Class A misdemeanor and who is in a place where the person lawfully resides. But it could have far-reaching influence.
Read More →
When Do You Transport a Wounded Officer by Police Vehicle?
Time-sensitive injuries like penetrating trauma mean a wounded officer needs to reach a trauma center as soon as possible, and in some cases, that means transporting by police vehicle rather than waiting for EMS. What are the factors to consider in making that transport decision?
Read More →
Safariland Solis Rethinks Concealable Duty
What if Level I retention didn’t require a full duty rig? Safariland’s Solis delivers trusted ALS security in a streamlined OWB platform built for administrative and plainclothes professionals who need protection without the bulk.
Read More →
5 Things to Know When Buying Backup Lights for Patrol Use
What is the value of a backup light, and what do you need to consider when selecting one? These smaller lights are invaluable as a secondary or special-purpose light and can be easily carried in a pocket or clipped to MOLLE gear, a key chain, shirt, or a vest.
Read More →
363 Fallen Officers Honored During National Police Week
In case you missed NELOMF’s annual Candlelight Vigil, here are all 363 names of the fallen officers whose names were added to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial this year.
Read More →
NYPD Officers Who Responded Quickly During IED Incident Recognized as NLEOMF Officers of the Month
Chief Aaron Edwards and Sgt. Luis Navarro were recognized by NLEOMF as Officers of the Month for their response during an IED incident and their actions that helped prevent harm to the public.
Read More →
National Police Survey Reveals How Americans View Policing Today
A new national survey offers a comprehensive look at how Americans view policing. The study uncovers public sentiment toward local vs. federal police, communications, crisis response, the use of AI in policing, and more.
Read More →
Streamlight TLR-7 X Selected as Standard Issue Pistol Light by Canadian Federal Police
The Canadian Federal Police will be adding a new duty pistol system, which will include Streamlight’s TLR-7 X and a Glock 45 MOS 7 pistol with a red dot sight.
Read More →
Fallen Law Enforcement Officers from Across the Country to be Honored During 38th Annual Candlelight Vigil on May 13th in Washington, D.C.
The National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund (NLEOMF) will honor 363 fallen officers who have died in the line of duty as their names are added to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial during the annual Candlelight Vigil on May 13.
Read More →
What Should Be in Your IFAK?
What should every officer include in an IFAK? Sydney Vail, M.D., a veteran trauma surgeon and former SWAT surgeon, explains which components are needed and which are not, and stresses training.
Read More →
