Consider the bizarre case of "Clock Kid," as it is a perfect example of what happens when security-minded Americans and law enforcement officers say something about and investigate suspicious behavior. Clock kid sounds like a laughable comic book supervillain, but he's a very real kid named Ahmed Mohamed who last year on Sept. 13 decided to deconstruct an old digital clock, put it inside a pencil box, and bring it to his high school in Irving, TX, the next day.
Clock Kid, who is of Sudanese ancestry and is a Muslim, says he did this to impress his teachers. But his teachers shouldn't have been impressed because any idiot can disassemble a clock and put it in a box. And I guess this is a total coincidence but the thing had a pretty solid resemblance to what most people think of when they think "briefcase bomb," although it clearly did not contain any explosives.
So after seeing this device—which Clock Kid insisted on showing everybody against the better advice of the engineering teacher he wanted to impress—one of his teachers decided to say something about it to her bosses. And that led to the school calling in the police and Clock Kid getting questioned for an hour and a half and handcuffed and the usual drill. And boy did everyone involved in saying something about the suspicious nature of Clock Kid's behavior and his "invention" get stitches.
Clock Kid's family, which has since moved to Qatar, is demanding a $15 million settlement and a public apology from the city of Irving, the police department, and the school system. Worse, the teachers and officers who questioned him and examined his clock who should have been commended for their vigilance have been called bigots and Islamophobes by everyone from celebrities to the president of the United States who invited Clock Kid to the White House.
So the federal government tells people to "say something" if they suspect terrorist activities, but the highest-ranking officials in that government vocally disparage anyone who says something and is wrong about their suspicions. This is an absurd policy, and it is having a chilling effect on anyone who might say something and is costing innocent lives.
One of Syeed Farook's and Tashfeen Malik's neighbors was suspicious about the activities at the couple's home before the San Bernardino Massacre but reportedly chose not to say anything to law enforcement for fear of being condemned for "profiling." That's where we are as a culture. We have become more afraid of being thought racist or Islamophobic than we are of saying nothing and letting bad things happen. Which is the real message of our national leadership when it comes to terrorism. They don't want people to say anything that might be construed as profiling no matter how many people die as a result.
We as a nation are expected to accept that it's better to die than be politically incorrect. We are in the same position as that of the residents of a gang-plagued neighborhood who know they had better not report any criminal activity to the police—even if they are the victims of the crime—because the retaliation by the gang members will be multiple times worse than the original offense. Such "snitches get stitches" intimidation makes the jobs of officers investigating gang crimes extremely difficult. And the federal government's and the popular media's condemnation of anyone who might say something about the truly suspicious behavior of people who happen to be Muslim puts us all at risk and makes law enforcement's counter-terrorism efforts much less effective.
