POLICE Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

New Jersey AG Approves Stun Guns For Officers

The state lifts its ban on the less-lethal weapons, and releases guidelines for officers. It had been the only state in the nation with the prohibition.

November 25, 2009
New Jersey AG Approves Stun Guns For Officers

 

New Jersey's attorney general has approved the use of stun guns and other electronic-control devices for law enforcement officers, according to the office.

Along with the approval, Attorney General Anne Milgram also issued a supplemental use-of-force policy that allows the stun guns to be used in limited circumstances involving emotionally disturbed individuals.

Ad Loading...

"This is the first time in this state that officers are going to be authorized to carry and use stun guns in any capacity," Milgram said in a statement. "Given this important shift in policy, it is prudent to have a limited initial deployment that provides for adequate controls, training and accountability measures so that we can evaluate the use of such devices."

State Police Benevolent Association president Anthony Wieners, who represents 33,000 police officers, told NJ.com that the policy is too restrictive and fails to give the state's police officers enough access to nonlethal force.

"With proper training, it should be able to be used like any other tool the officers are provided with, like a baton or pepper spray," he said.

The policy also limits the number of patrol officers per agency which could carry electronic control devices. There is no limit on the number of devices for SWAT and other emergency response teams.

Officers who wish to carry a stun gun must also complete a Police Training Commission-approved course and obtain authorization from his or her department's chief executive.

Ad Loading...

Milgram's office also issued a litany of restrictions about how the devices can be used.

Stun guns can't be used as a "pain compliance" device or in a situation where a person refuses to comply with an officer's order to move, or get on the ground, or exit a vehicle.

The use of the electronic devices is also prohibited if an individual is handcuffed or in a moving vehicle and should not be used to prevent someone from committing property damage or fleeing a scene, accordign to the policy.

The devices also "should not be directed against a person who is situated on an elevated surface, such as a ledge or near a precipice, unless reasonable efforts have been made to prevent or minimize a fall-related injury."

And lastly, the stun guns also could not be used with the gun in direct contact with a person, a condition known as "drive stun mode."

Ad Loading...

Even with these restrictions, TASER welcomed the approval by Milgram's office.

"This is a huge step forward for law enforcement in New Jersey," said Tom Smith, TASER's chairman and founder. "The expectations during this initial phase are that New Jersey law enforcement agencies will begin to experience reductions in officer and suspect injuries, and municipalities will reduce their risk liability with savings in working compensations and legal costs."

Ad Loading...

More Point of Law

patrolfinder - reducing crime thumbnail
SponsoredOctober 27, 2025

How One Police Department Cut Crime by 46% with Smarter Patrol Management

Discover how one police department cut crime nearly in half using smarter patrol data. This whitepaper breaks down the real-world strategy behind a 46% drop in vehicle thefts, improved officer safety, and stronger community visibility.

Read More →
Point of Law logo with scales of justice in metallic silver text
Patrolby Eric DaigleSeptember 1, 2025

Point of Law: The Limits of Electronic Searches

Can an individual be prosecuted for despicable criminal conduct based on evidence obtained in violation of the United States Constitution? Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit judges wrote, “In the circumstances of this case (United States v. Holcomb, 23-469 (9th Cir. 2025)), respect for the Constitution and the rule of law requires an answer of “no.”

Read More →
PatrolAugust 25, 2025

Trump Issues Order Cutting Federal Funding in Cashless Bail Jurisdictions

<strong>“</strong>Cashless bail policies allow dangerous individuals to immediately return to the streets and further endanger law-abiding, hard-working Americans because they know our laws will not be enforced,” the administration said.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawJuly 2, 2025

Justice Department Sues Los Angeles Over Sanctuary Policies

The DOJ said in a press release that the “sanctuary city” policies of the City of Los Angeles are illegal under federal law.

Read More →
Point of Lawby Kevin R. MadisonJune 20, 2025

Understanding Officer-Created Jeopardy

Officers can be criminally prosecuted for using force when their actions led to escalation during contact with subjects.

Read More →
Point of LawJune 18, 2025

Point of Law: The Limitations of Search Warrants

In the Tenth Circuit case of Cuervo v. Sorenson, the Court ruled officers cannot deviate from the language of the warrant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawMay 21, 2025

DOJ Dismisses Consent Decrees Affecting Louisville and Minneapolis Police

The Civil Rights Division will be taking all necessary steps to dismiss the Louisville and Minneapolis lawsuits with prejudice, to close the underlying investigations into the Louisville and Minneapolis police departments.

Read More →
Point of LawApril 28, 2025

New Michigan Bill would Give Officers Civil Immunity in Self-Defense Cases

House Bill 4404 would create a presumption of civil immunity for individuals who are cleared criminally after using force in self-defense, shifting the burden of proof onto plaintiffs.

Read More →
Point of LawApril 8, 2025

Seattle to Pay Police Captain $1 Million to Settle Lawsuit

Seattle police Capt. Eric Greening sued former Chief Adrian Diaz last year alleging that Diaz retaliated when Greening brought up concerns about racial and gender discrimination.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawMarch 13, 2025

Washington Agencies Ordered to Not Delete Critical Facebook Contents

Jim Leighty, a local activist, filed two federal lawsuits last year claiming both agencies deleted or hid critical comments he had written below multiple posts, while keeping comments that were pro-police in nature.

Read More →