Voters in Philadelphia, Chicago, Baltimore, and other major American cities have elected prosecutors who have promised to reduce incarceration, refused to prosecute certain selected offenses, focused more on prosecuting police officers, and operated with an approach that is generally more friendly to those on the wrong side of the law.
The results, as measured by violent crime, have not been good. Each of the involved cities have seen homicide rates—a yardstick commonly relied on to measure the general “temperature” of crime in the city—jump significantly since electing their current prosecutors.
Public defender turned civil rights lawyer Larry Krasner is now district attorney in Philadelphia. To say he does not fit the typical profile of a big city prosecutor would be an understatement. But in 2016, amid promises to “reform” the criminal justice system, he was easily elected. The central theme of his campaign was that he would sharply reduce the number of persons incarcerated.
Not long ago such a campaign promise probably wouldn’t have resonated with voters in an election for district attorney, an office that pretty much exists solely to seek the incarceration of criminals who threaten the safety of the public. But Krasner has embraced the social justice label despite the major fissures and deep philosophical differences with his primary crime fighting partners, the Philadelphia Police Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
In the wake of the shooting of six Philadelphia police officers who were attempting to serve a narcotics search warrant, Krasner drew deservedly harsh criticism from United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania William McSwain. "The Philadelphia District Attorney's Office isn't putting fear into the hearts of anybody who is contemplating a life of violent crime," said McSwain.