I attended portions of this year's exercise in Long Beach and was impressed by the thorough planning that went into it. However, reading about agencies' performances throughout the state, I was disappointed to hear about difficulties with
emergency communications systems
.
Effective communication is essential in large-scale emergencies. With multiple agencies working together on a complex and fast-paced incident, every second counts; there's no room for delay or error. With 9/11, we can all recall the potentially tragic consequences of a communications failure in such a situation.
Despite legislative action and increased funding for interoperable systems over the past 10 years, public safety has been slow to implement changes that could drastically improve communications capabilities.
Rather than opening up and integrating systems to allow compatibility across different equipment, industry leaders have stuck with a handful of proprietary applications made by a handful of equipment manufacturers. Being tied to specific systems has impeded our control over the level of technology available in the public safety market. These factors continue to make agencies vulnerable to communications glitches.
Many departments have used the same product lines of equipment for years. Hesitation in moving to a new system is relatable, but it will hold them back. While the
U.S. military
has been using interoperable communications systems for decades, few public safety agencies have experience with them.