The murkiness of the term comes from the wide spectrum of possible wounds. You can be shot and receive a grazing wound that the reporters discount despite the fact that none of them would volunteer for the experience. Or you can be shot and be paralyzed, or brain damaged, or have internal organ damage. And even one of those non-life threatening gunshot or stab wounds can result in a lifetime of chronic pain.
The truth is that it can be difficult to kill someone with a handgun or knife in 2019. Emergency medicine is really effective these days, even when someone is shot in the head. And because of that emergency medical care many an officer has survived critical wounds.
Many of these grievously wounded officers have exhibited great courage and determination in trying to rebuild their lives. Consider the case of Arnold, MO, police officer Ryan O' Connor. In December 2017, Officer O'Connor was transporting a burglary suspect when the man somehow managed to gain access to a pistol and shot the officer in the back of the head. Officer O'Connor was not expected to survive that terrible wound. But he did. And with the support of his wife, his family, his friends, and the national law enforcement community, he is working every day to rebuild the life that was nearly taken from him.
Officers like Ryan O'Connor are why we need a better accounting of the men and women in law enforcement who are wounded on duty. The statistics on the fallen are not enough to provide the public with a portrait of the real sacrifice of the men and women who wear the badge. Reporters and columnists use this incomplete portrait to point out that there are much more dangerous professions. Worse, they tend to discount the malicious nature of the damage inflicted on officers by referring to men and women who were intentionally wounded as "injured."
Each May we hold a ceremony to honor law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty. Maybe it's time we also held a ceremony to honor those wounded on duty.