POLICE Logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Op-Ed: Good Riddance to Gascón

California sent progressive district attorneys packing, making the state safer for cops and the people they serve.

by Staff
November 13, 2024
Op-Ed: Good Riddance to Gascón

The official photo of Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón. Voters turned him out of office in the Nov. 5 election.

Credit:

Los Angeles County DA


One of the most important outcomes of the 2024 November elections has been lost in the jubilation and/or outrage over Donald Trump defeating Kamala Harris for the presidency. Two progressive district attorneys were tossed out on their ears by California voters. Los Angeles County DA George Gascón was crushed in his bid for reelection and Alameda County (Oakland) DA Pamela Price was recalled.

Ad Loading...

Gascón is kind of the poster boy for criminal justice reform, which is strange given his personal history. He served in the LAPD, rising from patrol officer to assistant chief; was police chief of San Francisco and of Mesa, Arizona, and DA of San Francisco, all before he was elected the 43rd DA of Los Angeles County. Somewhere in all that criminal justice background, Gascón came to view the prosecution and incarceration of criminals as oppressing the offenders rather than protecting society. And he believed he could fix the system.

His proposed fix for California’s criminal justice system was Proposition 47. Gascón co-authored that infamous get-out-of-jail-free proposal while he was serving as San Francisco DA. And when voters made the proposition law in 2014, it essentially made thefts involving less than $950 in value into misdemeanors, misdemeanors that are rarely prosecuted.

Immediately after crime became “legal” in California, criminals ran amok. Many folks in San Francisco got new cardboard car windows as auto burglary became the city’s most popular pastime. It’s estimated that property crime in San Francisco rose more than 35% from 2011 to 2019 when Gascón was the city’s top prosecutor.

San Francisco was left in such a mess after Gascón left office in 2019 that officials from the most progressive municipality in the country tried to warn voters in Los Angeles County not to elect him. But 2020 was the year of George Floyd and Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and defund the police, so Gascón defeated incumbent LA County DA Jackie Lacey 54% to 47%.

On day one in office Gascón announced his social justice warrior agenda for the LA County DA’s office. In a press conference he stated that the office would not seek gang or firearm enhancements, would not try juveniles as adults, would not ask for cash bail in most cases, would not seek the death penalty, and would not be opposing any parole requests. Period.

Ad Loading...

This list of decrees was met with vocal and public resistance from some of the 1,000 prosecutors that Gascón was supposed to lead. Of course, he also announced that a focus of his office would be prosecuting police.

Gascón acted quickly to free criminals. Just 100 days into office, he announced that he had eliminated 8,127 years of “unnecessary, excessive, and expensive exposure to prison time.” Los Angeles focused news outlet LAist called that “a statistic no previous LA DA would have wanted, much less touted.”

Very quickly, Gascón’s coddle criminals approach to prosecution met with resistance from crime victims and from law enforcement. It also led to more dangerous repeat offenders on the streets of not only Los Angeles but other California cities and even other states.

Some encounters between police and criminals released by Gascón led to extreme violence and even deadly exchanges of fire. In one 2022 case, two El Monte, California, officers—Corporal Michael Paredes and Officer Joseph Santanna—were shot and killed by a convicted felon who had been arrested for gun offenses in 2020 and was on probation because of Gascón’s policies.

Gascón’s policies and their effects led to two attempted recalls that failed to make the ballot because of technicalities. But he finally got removed on Nov. 5, 2024.

Ad Loading...

The new Los Angeles County District Attorney, Nathan Hochman, is a former federal prosecutor who vows to be tough on crime. Time will tell.

What we do know now is that Hochman has a huge task ahead. The prosecutors now under his direction are said to be demoralized and divided between Gascón loyalists and Gascón haters. There’s even two-dozen lawsuits claiming that Gascón retaliated against prosecutors who opposed his agenda. Worst of all, there are reports of some 10,000 cases that have not been reviewed to determine if charges should be filed.

As for Gascón, he took two major blows on election night. He was voted out of office. And his baby, Prop 47, got a serious rewrite from the voters when they overwhelmingly approved Prop 36.

Some 70% of California voters said “yes” on 36, which makes repeat shoplifters eligible for felony prosecution, adds sentence enhancements for group theft, and creates the category of a treatment mandated felony for some drug crimes. The goal of Prop 36 is to stop the epidemic of shoplifting in the Golden State and reduce drug use.

With progressive DAs like Price and Gascón sent packing and Prop 47 rewritten, maybe California’s leaders will finally address the crime and other quality-of-life issues that plague the state. And maybe, just maybe, police and prosecutors will be allowed to do their jobs and get the bad guys off the street.

Ad Loading...


Subscribe to our newsletter

More Point of Law

patrolfinder - reducing crime thumbnail
SponsoredOctober 27, 2025

How One Police Department Cut Crime by 46% with Smarter Patrol Management

Discover how one police department cut crime nearly in half using smarter patrol data. This whitepaper breaks down the real-world strategy behind a 46% drop in vehicle thefts, improved officer safety, and stronger community visibility.

Read More →
Point of Law logo with scales of justice in metallic silver text
Patrolby Eric DaigleSeptember 1, 2025

Point of Law: The Limits of Electronic Searches

Can an individual be prosecuted for despicable criminal conduct based on evidence obtained in violation of the United States Constitution? Ultimately, the Ninth Circuit judges wrote, “In the circumstances of this case (United States v. Holcomb, 23-469 (9th Cir. 2025)), respect for the Constitution and the rule of law requires an answer of “no.”

Read More →
PatrolAugust 25, 2025

Trump Issues Order Cutting Federal Funding in Cashless Bail Jurisdictions

<strong>“</strong>Cashless bail policies allow dangerous individuals to immediately return to the streets and further endanger law-abiding, hard-working Americans because they know our laws will not be enforced,” the administration said.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawJuly 2, 2025

Justice Department Sues Los Angeles Over Sanctuary Policies

The DOJ said in a press release that the “sanctuary city” policies of the City of Los Angeles are illegal under federal law.

Read More →
Point of Lawby Kevin R. MadisonJune 20, 2025

Understanding Officer-Created Jeopardy

Officers can be criminally prosecuted for using force when their actions led to escalation during contact with subjects.

Read More →
Point of LawJune 18, 2025

Point of Law: The Limitations of Search Warrants

In the Tenth Circuit case of Cuervo v. Sorenson, the Court ruled officers cannot deviate from the language of the warrant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawMay 21, 2025

DOJ Dismisses Consent Decrees Affecting Louisville and Minneapolis Police

The Civil Rights Division will be taking all necessary steps to dismiss the Louisville and Minneapolis lawsuits with prejudice, to close the underlying investigations into the Louisville and Minneapolis police departments.

Read More →
Point of LawApril 28, 2025

New Michigan Bill would Give Officers Civil Immunity in Self-Defense Cases

House Bill 4404 would create a presumption of civil immunity for individuals who are cleared criminally after using force in self-defense, shifting the burden of proof onto plaintiffs.

Read More →
Point of LawApril 8, 2025

Seattle to Pay Police Captain $1 Million to Settle Lawsuit

Seattle police Capt. Eric Greening sued former Chief Adrian Diaz last year alleging that Diaz retaliated when Greening brought up concerns about racial and gender discrimination.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Point of LawMarch 13, 2025

Washington Agencies Ordered to Not Delete Critical Facebook Contents

Jim Leighty, a local activist, filed two federal lawsuits last year claiming both agencies deleted or hid critical comments he had written below multiple posts, while keeping comments that were pro-police in nature.

Read More →