Budgets remain a big concern even in the largest of agencies. It's a given there is a lack of funding, so the issue becomes who gets what little there is. It would be easier if budgets were just based on need. Unfortunately, it's never that simple. Budgets are based on politics, bureaucratic red tape, and whatever hot topic is floating around in your decision-maker's head. What you may see as a need may not even be on the radar. The reality is where you sit (your position within the agency) determines where you stand (your views).
If you are an administrator, you have a broader view of the agency as a whole. If you are in a specialty unit, your world revolves around your specific mission. So which viewpoint wins? It depends on how you look at it. If you are a "cup is half empty" person, then the guy who controls the purse strings wins. If you are a "cup is half full" person, then having the right perspective, attitude, and imagination can conquer the frustration of an ever-shrinking budget. It is possible to still make things happen.








