Although some organizations are not completely sold on QuikClot, the Navy and Marines performed a limited study using a swine model and were impressed with the results enough to issue the product to combat medics serving in Afghanistan and Iraq.
In a press release packet sent to us from Z-Medica dated April 9, 2003, company Vice President Bart Gullong was quoted saying, “Based on QuikClot’s performance in Operation Iraqi Freedom, we are now gearing up production to accommodate even faster worldwide adoption of it by all first responders: police, firefighters, EMTs, and anyone who is first on the scene of a severe bleeding injury.”
In contrast, Brian Drummond MC, USNR, who served as the surgeon for the 3rd Batallion, 4th Marines, 7th Regiment, 1st Marine Division between March and April 2003 in Iraq and treated 140 casualties on the battlefield never used nor witnessed the use of QuikClot while there. Drummond, who had 54 Navy Corpsmen under his command, says that although QuikClot was available in their medical bags, none of them used Quik- Clot, nor was it ever needed. “The extremity wounds were all controlled with direct pressure and tourniquet,” says Drummond.
The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) was asked by the Marine Corps to evaluate the continued use of QuikClot. Col. David G. Burris, M.D., interim chairman of the U.S.U. Department of Surgery, chaired the panel. The panel reinforced the FDA’s recommendation that QuikClot should be used only for life-threatening hemorrhaging after conventional hemorrhage control efforts have failed. It also reported that it should only be used to treat external wounds, and then only after standard hemostatic techniques to control bleeding have failed, according to a report released Feb. 26, 2003.
Lt. Bruce Webb, Battalion Surgeon, 2nd Tank Battalion attached to the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, saw action in central Iraq from March 20 to May 30, 2003 and reported to us his first-hand battlefield experience with QuikClot.