The truth is many agencies refuse officers' attempts to create "Batbelts" because it's difficult for them to control the training of officers with unique equipment, and the fact it may alter the way departmentally approved and trained equipment is worn or used. Officers have died trying to draw weapons from holsters whose attributes were altered because of a poorly placed baton or flashlight holder. Even if some new, slick, cool, fancy, science fiction-looking piece of equipment is allowed to be carried on your belt, you have to decide if it truly adds value to your belt. Does it help you win?
If it does, then you better train, train, train until using it becomes automatic. In risk management parlance this is called "unconscious competence," and it's the level to which you should train with anything on which your life depends. Bad guys point and click their guns and tend to hit without any formal training; they don't put stuff on their weapons, they don't have super fancy lights or widgets. They just have the barebones bad guy attitude and equipment. And now the FBI says after studying the career criminal, these bad guys shoot more practice rounds a year than we do.
An analysis of law enforcement deaths should make us examine the types of training and equipment that can give us the edge over our greatest risks: assailants and accidents. Read any marketing material for the coolest weapons, lights, clothes, armor, and or police toys and you will be told all the reasons you should buy this or that. But I strongly recommend you first read the reviews, not just the ads, and then ponder the following:
1. Does this new item replace an essential old item? If it does, train like your life depends on it … It might.
2. Does the new gizmo change the way you use other tools? Does it affect your draw or your ability to draw other items without looking?