The first thing any thinking gang cop should do is to read a copy of the NGTA and go to the section with the statistics published on his or her jurisdiction and see if the figures are anywhere in the ballpark. I'll bet that the local gang cops who actually work the listed gangs had little to do with the data submitted by his or her jurisdiction. That job was probably left to administrators and crime analysts.
The report utilizes 2,963 agencies out of 3,465 queried to form its assessments and opinions on emerging trends. This 85% response is a very good percentage. In the past, the numbers were more like 40%. But my keen gang detective mind asks, "what happened to the 502 agencies that did not respond, and why?"
Truthfully, many cities and counties purposely don't report statistics on gang activity, especially in areas where tourism is a major industry. Also, the statistics in other jurisdictions can be influenced by political correctness, such as not reporting violent gang activity by illegal aliens or gang crime committed by immigrants from Islamic nations.
Politicians routinely cause gang crimes to be under-reported as a basis for claims that their current administration is effectively reducing criminal activity, when nothing could be further from the truth. One trick they use is to reduce the number of gang cops and analysts who imput data in the gang computer database. Less numbers in the system create the perception of less crime.
I've read most of the prior NGTA reports and find that the NGTA always seems to be running five to 10 years behind the times, at least in large urban areas such as New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles. The influence of prison gangs, transnational gangs, drug cartels, gangs in the military, African and Muslim gangs were evident to most of us years before the trends were mentioned in the NGTA.