Administrative Corruption
The definition of corruption is “the misuse of public power for private benefit.” Think of officers taking money for not performing their duties, à la Serpico. Corruption scandals have rocked police agencies for years in New York, Los Angeles, and other major cities but in reality organized, systemic corruption has basically been eradicated from law enforcement.
Thankfully, gone are the days when money and/or political favors for non-enforcement as well as organizationally accepted brutality plagued law enforcement agencies. But one aspect of corruption has long been unrecognized or confronted, administrative corruption, defined as “privileges granted through the power of authority misused for private benefit.” This is a term that chiefs and sheriffs shudder to hear and almost refuse to accept.
The heads of law enforcement agencies across the country are in positions of immense power. Many have no checks and balances such as police unions or bargaining units that can bring personnel situations forward for mediation. And even when those unions or bargaining units exist, officers know that when you “fight city hall” you are bound to lose in the long run. So when a law enforcement officer actually takes on “the system” it truly is an act of not just courage but usually desperation. Case in point: “Lobstergate,” where honest, hard-working cops discovered misconduct within their own ranks.
The Lobstergate scenario is the nightmare situation that haunts all police officers because it is truly a “no-win” situation. If you come forward you are “the snitch,” and you face being ostracized by your peers. If you don’t come forward, you may be drawn into the scandal and be seen as an accomplice.