The degree to which that tally shows a deficit will depend upon who's doing all the adding (the capacity to explore new approaches to community policing and enhancement of the profession's technology) and subtracting (alleged custodial brutalities that have cost tax payers millions, a fostering of department cliques, and his own questionable assertions as to what he did know or should have known). Many of these problems are interrelated, not without precedent, and certainly not unique to LASD. It's just the sheriff's department's turn in the spotlight. (Not to worry, LAPD, the light will swing back to you soon enough. I promise)
It is fair to say that, like his predecessor, Baca overstayed his welcome; as such, he has proven to be just one more unnecessary reminder of what happens when those who seize the reins of power attempt to retain them with a death-grip thereafter. How much better might it be to leave a more favorable, if shorter, legacy, than it is to leave behind a long and sad one?
In that same spirit of giving credit where it's due, it should be noted that he handled himself well at the podium in announcing his sudden, if belated, retirement.
That he didn't come across as defensive was no small accomplishment given his circumstances, and I couldn't help but wonder if he'd come across as even-tempered early on, that maybe his inner circle would have been populated with men and women greater capable of acting in the best interests of the community, the department, and him.
Good luck to his successor. He or she is gonna need it.