The problem starts with how agencies train new supervisors. Most of the time, an officer goes from asking questions one day, to being the sergeant who has to answer questions the next. Officers rarely receive much preparation for the transition. When new supervisors assume their command relationships, they are often left to their own devices. If the only supervisory role you have ever experienced is as the coach of a little league team, you are in for a rude awakening.
For example, the very guys you were telling jokes to yesterday in the locker room might be the ones you have to admonish today for their jokes being inappropriate. That role reversal tends to go over like a lead balloon.
The reality is you can't be everyone's friend. The best you can do is be friendly and treat everyone with respect. You have to understand that no one gets a pass when they violate policy and procedure. Your retirement is not worth their
inconvenience.
We would like to think that everyone in law enforcement can draw a line in the sand when it comes to on-duty and off-duty relationships. However, understanding and working though on-duty and off-duty relationships is easier said than done. It's been my experience that it is an exception to the rule when you can admonish a subordinate at work and yet have a beer over a game of darts later on.
Part of the problem stems from our own use of the English language. We use the word friend far too often and far too loosely. Today's meaning of "friend" (at least at work) really means "acquaintance." We use the words interchangeably. Yes, our duty binds us together at work, but that doesn't automatically make us friends. Ask yourself these questions: How many of the people you work with would you invite over to your house for dinner? How many would you like to spend the weekend with camping, fishing, or doing another favorite activity of yours? How many people are you really close with? If you are honest with yourself, it's not going to be that many.