But it's OK to have a broader focus as long as your instructions establish guidelines. "I need you to come up with eight hours of handgun training focusing on firing from cover, malfunctions drills, and reloading under stress" is a good example. Here, the person is free to design any drill he or she likes, as long as it stays within your guidelines.
I also recommend any additional instructions that might help you manage your task. Stating, "I need a lesson plan by Wednesday, Feb. 6, 2015, no later than 1600, and a walk-through of the drills at the range on Thursday, Feb. 7, 2015, at 0900" works well. Adding additional instructions helps keep you on top of the task and check progress. But you may be accused of micromanaging.
Having a hand in what you are trying to accomplish is part of leadership. Trying to control every aspect of a task is not. Being specific is not micromanaging.
But be advised that questionable officers take a mile when you give them an inch. They are masters of deflection and take everything you say literally. These subordinates teach you the hard way that words have meaning so you better pick and choose wisely. At the first sign of trouble, these officers will fall back to, "But I did what you said." Of course your next comment will most likely be, "You know what I meant!"
The counter to "You know what I meant" is often, "I only know what you said." All supervisors will experience some version of this at some point in their careers. You learn it becomes a framework for dodging responsibility. If you weren't specific enough and left wiggle room in your instructions, you don't have a leg to stand on if things don't go as expected.