A DHS spokesperson attempted to justify the AUO suspension by stating the department is ensuring the "…proper use of taxpayer funds." That statement lacks credibility given the timing of the DHS' decision. FLEOA questions where this alleged commitment to taxpayer funds was prior to Congress expressing its concerns. Rather than prematurely suspend the financial lifeline for many law enforcement officers, DHS should have first completed a thorough review of the system and its oversight as relates to AUO.
According to FLEOA National President Jon Adler, "The Acting ICE Director and DHS leadership are drawing from the "Wile E Coyote" management guide: one aspect of a system doesn't work, so they scrap the entire system. After these law enforcement officers endured a three‐year pay freeze and the impact of sequestration, don't they deserve the professional courtesy of a comprehensive review before siphoning 25% of their pay?"
FLEOA recognizes the importance of the findings in the report released by the Office of Special Counsel, and doesn't advocate for the indiscriminate issuance of AUO pay. However, FLEOA asserts that DHS should have implemented better oversight on the AUO process rather than cower to Congress and simply eliminate pay from the impacted groups.
Adler added, "The work performed by both headquarter personnel and training components is vital to the sustained operations and level of preparedness for DHS. By arbitrarily eliminating their AUO pay, DHS is giving itself two flat tires. Accountability isn't accomplished through the impetuous financial decapitation of law enforcement officers. It's accomplished by a professional examination of existing procedures, an analysis of current workloads and schedules, and a review of best practices by other agencies."
FLEOA also expressed concern regarding DHS' failure to engage law enforcement stakeholder groups prior to announcing its rash decision to curtail AUO. In the ICE Acting Director's AUO message, he alludes to working with "labor relations partners" in the future. Unfortunately, that's as meaningful as offering to buy body armor for an officer after you fatally wound them.
FLEOA is respectfully asking DHS Secretary Johnson to rescind the suspension of AUO pending the results of a comprehensive review of the relevant factors. DHS headquarter and training personnel are taxpayers too, and depriving them of one quarter of their livelihood without a due diligence review is unjust.
FLEOA remains ready to work with DHS leadership to resolve this critical issue through a transparent process that is credible in its approach and methodology. We are not going to balance the budget and eliminate the deficit by starving the men and women who defend our homeland.
