The second area revolves around the elements of the crime. Your narrative must support your heading and statute number. Make sure that each element is listed as a bullet point or included in a sentence. For example, in Florida the offense of battery (F.S.S 784.03(1) (a)1) states "The offense of battery occurs when a person actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other." If you were writing a battery report, you could outline the elements of battery by writing the facts this way: "Upon arrival I met with the victim, who advised that someone without consent hit him twice in the face with a closed fist."
The third area you need to check for is the journalistic approach to writing. This is nothing more than the writer trying to answer who, what, when, where, why, and how. Your job as supervisor is to make sure your subordinate has answered as many of these questions as possible. If the officer doesn't have an answer, have him or her state why. For example, if you have no witness information, stating "The victim could not provide any witness information," answers the question nicely. If the officer did a neighborhood canvass, writing "After checking with the surrounding neighbors at 214, 216, and 218 Broadmoor Street, I could not locate any witness information," works equally as well.
The fourth and final area to check for is how the crime scene was treated. This is where you check to see if your agency's policy was followed and that your officers actually did what they wrote. Lazy officers tend to write, "The scene was processed with negative results." Left alone, that statement creates more questions than it answers. What was processed and where was it processed? Much better is having the officer write something like this: "I processed the kitchen cabinet, refrigerator, and countertops for latent prints and was not able to lift any." This is a much stronger sentence and leaves no new questions in its wake.
Another issue is that officers think processing a scene just means checking for latent prints. You know as a supervisor it means looking for any kind of physical evidence: blood, broken glass, boot marks, and the like. It also means that when you do find and submit evidence, documenting the chain of custody properly is very important.
The last bit of advice I have for checking information in reports I call the phone number analogy. I use this as my guide for answering all types of questions, not merely the ones on preprinted forms. Using this model, there are only three possible answers when asked, "Do you have a phone number?" The person either has one, doesn't have one, or doesn't have the number now but can get it to you later. It works the same way for any question. The person has the answer, the answer is no or none, or the person doesn't know the answer when asked but can get you the information later. Following this format will help mitigate the number of N/A answers or blank spaces on your forms.
