FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cobalt Software Platform - Mark43
Mark43's Cobalt software platform unites a set of law enforcement tools securely...

Transforming Police Reporting with Speech Recognition Technology

Brought to you by:

Register now!

Wednesday, November 28, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

An exceeding number of police departments and law enforcement agencies, whose officers spend upwards of 3-4 hours a day completing incident reports and other time-sensitive paperwork*, are turning to smarter tools, such as speech recognition solutions, to help transform their police reporting workflows.

Join us on Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 2:00 PM ET to hear why these law enforcement professionals are embracing smarter tools to complete higher-quality reports and move mission-critical information within the CAD/RMS faster and more efficiently – all by voice.

This discussion will provide you with an understanding of:

  • What law enforcement has to say about current reporting processes
  • Why officers, especially recruits, want smarter tools to help with police paperwork
  • Why manual reporting has a negative impact on report accuracy and productivity and can hinder criminal proceedings
  • How departments can speed up data entry within the CAD/RMs and move mission-critical information more accurately and efficiently
  • How speech recognition technology can help increase officer safety and improve situational awareness and productivity on patrol
  • Why embracing smarter technology increases community visibility, and minimizes costs

Learn how your department can make incident reporting faster, safer and more complete by registering for our webinar today.

*Role of Technology in Law Enforcement Paperwork Survey 


Eric La Scola, Product Marketing Manager, Dragon, Nuance

Top News

Alarm Industry Vows to Fight Detroit PD's Verification Policy

August 17, 2011  | 

A trade association representing the security industry pledged to challenge the Detroit Police Department's new policy requiring verification of the break-in before officers respond to a burglar alarm.

Chief Ralph Godbee Jr., on Monday, said false alarms have been a tremendous drain on his department's resources. He said 98 percent of burglar alarms are false.

"We were caught completely by surprise," Security Industry Alarm Coalition (SIAC) Executive Director Stan Martin tells Security Sales & Integration. "We were working with the folks at the highest levels in the department and they gave us no indication that they were moving in this direction."

A departmental review showed that false alarms had the greatest financial and staffing impact on the department, according to a Detroit PD press release. As a result, the department will not respond to calls from alarm companies unless:

  • The alarm company sends someone to visually verify a crime has been committed.
  • A property owner or employee responds to the location to visually verify a break-in.
  • The occurrence of a break-in or crime is verified through use of audio or video technology.
  • The alarm company reports multiple alarm trips from at least two sensors at the alarm site (such as a first alarm from a point of entry such as a door or window, followed by a second alarm from an interior device, such as a motion detector).

The Burglar and Fire Alarm Association of Michigan (BFAAM) and SIAC officials have been attempting to convince the department to delay or stop implementation of the policy. Dean Belisle, president of BFAAM, says he has worked closely with Commander Todd Bettison on other false alarm issues for nearly a year.

"A minimum of 30 days is what's needed to make the transition," Martin says. "Sixty days would be more reasonable, particularly if people decide they want upgrades. Of course, we also happen to believe that there is going to be a large portion of folks in Detroit that are already financially stressed and won't have the resources to either change their system or pay for private security."

Belisle says he thinks it will take roughly six to 12 months to fully comply with the transition.

"We don't know how many alarms are out there," he says. "So let's say a company like ADT, the biggest player in the industry, hypothetically has 30,000 clients in Detroit. The question is how long will it take to go and visit 30,000 sites to spend with the client, review the current system, explain to them what their options are, and get it installed? No company has the manpower to do that."

In an attempt to persuade the department to delay the policy implementation, BFAAM is asking its member companies and their clients in the Detroit area to participate in a letter writing campaign to the mayor's offices and city council. Since BFAAM and SIAC have collaborated successfully in the past with the Detroit PD - namely by implementing enhanced call verification (ECV) in 2010, reducing false alarms by nearly 35 percent - the organizations are striving to maintain good relations with police officials. However, Belisle notes that the recent policy hinders that partnership.

The Detroit PD maintains that the concerns by the alarm industry and citizens that crimes would increase because of the policy are unwarranted. "Data from cities requiring a verified response before dispatching officers shows no clear trend for an increase in burglaries after implementation," according to a statement released by the department.

Additionally, the police officers will continue to respond to human activated alarms, including hold-up, panic, or duress.

By Ashley Willis

Related: Detroit Police Require Alarm Verification for Burglary Response

Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

MJ Turnbow @ 8/18/2011 7:06 AM

Easy answer to this one. Allow the alarm company a set number of non weather related alarms per month. After that, $250.00 (or more) per false alarm that is paid to the Dept. to cover expenses. Don't pay...PD does not respond. We implemented that policy and our false alarms dropped 65%

MikeAT @ 8/18/2011 10:08 PM

We allow 8 false calls a year and after that we issue citations and don't respond.

Martyb @ 8/19/2011 3:56 PM

Our City P.D. used to allow 4 false alarms without penalty. They are in the process of cutting the "Freebies" back to two. THe County Sheriff is a bit more liberal. Most reasonable (smart) people will figure out what is causing their false alarms and make the needed repairs. Sometimes it's as simple as changing the alram company and the equipment...

Ed Maldonado @ 8/20/2011 9:28 AM

In 14 years of Law Enforcement I have never responded to an alarm call that was not a false alarm. Where I work you get three free false alarms then you start paying. Many times and alarm company will contact our dispatcher to tell them that they verified that it was false and cancel the police, however we still get send to "verify".

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

New Jersey City's Voters Approve Gunfire Detection System ShotSpotter
The unofficial vote showed 1,566, or more than 70 percent, of residents voted yes on a...
Law Enforcement Embracing Computer Voice Stress Analyzer Technology
Innocent people are being exonerated in record numbers as new technologies such as DNA...
Panasonic Announces Updated Toughbook 31
Panasonic announced the U.S. launch of its newly upgraded Toughbook 31 laptop computer....
Telit LM960 mPCIe LTE Module Joins the FirstNet Lineup
Telit, a global enabler of the Internet of Things (IoT), has announced that its LM960 PCI...

Police Magazine