FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Top News

Supreme Court Limits Detention Powers In Searches

February 19, 2013  | 

Photo: POLICE file
Photo: POLICE file

Suffolk County (N.Y.) Police detectives who detained two suspects, while officers searched a dwelling exceeded the scope of their search warrant, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the search was not reasonable. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Bailey v. United States.

The detectives obtained a search warrant in July 2005, after getting a tip that a heavyset black man named "Polo" had a gun and drugs in his basement apartment, reports Courthouse News.

Detectives arrived at the Wyandanch location and saw two men matching the description of Polo leaving the residence in a black Lexus. Detectives followed the men for about a mile and pulled them over, while other officers began searching the apartment.

One of the men, Chunon Bailey, told the detectives he was coming from his home at the location listed in the warrant. Bailey, who was unaware of the search, had a key for the apartment and his driver's license showed an address identified by the confidential informant as Polo's former address.

Police placed Bailey and the other man, Bryant Middleton, in handcuffs and revealed that officers were searching the location. Bailey then told the detectives that he didn't live at the address.

After officers at the location found a firearm and 5 grams of cocaine, Bailey was arrested and charged. His attorneys argued that his statements and the key were obtained from an unreasonable search that violated his Fourth Amendment rights.

Related:

Warrantless Detention Case Heads to Supreme Court


Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Ima Leprechaun @ 2/20/2013 4:13 AM

Bad decision. I can only assume the there was no probable cause for the traffic stop which lead to the poisoning of the evidence trail but I am just guessing since there is little information in this article.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

Fechheimer Brothers Company Celebrates 175 Years in Business
Fechheimer Brothers Company, the parent company of the uniform brand Flying Cross and...
Suicide Bomber Attacks NY Bus Terminal, Paper Says
The suspected bomber – who had wires attached to him – was armed with a pipe bomb and a...
SC Officer Killed in Single-Car Accident
A Johnston, SC, police officer was killed Friday night in a single-vehicle accident....
MO Officer Fighting for Life After Being Shot in Head Tuesday
Officer Ryan O’Connor of the Arnold (MO) Police Department who was shot earlier this week...
FBI Has Not Responded to Baltimore Request to Take Over Duty Death Investigation
The FBI is heavily involved in a police corruption case that Suiter was scheduled to...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
Police Magazine