FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!
Bob Parker

Bob Parker

Lt. Robert Parker served with the Omaha (Neb.) PD for 30 years and commanded the Emergency Response Unit. He is responsible for training thousands of law enforcement instructors in NTOA's Patrol Response to Active Shooters courses.



Jose Medina

Jose Medina

Officer Jose Medina is an active member of the Piscataway (N.J.) Police Department's SWAT team and runs Awareness Protective Consultants (Team APC) tactical training.
SWAT

When Facts Won't Satisfy the LE Critics

Members of the media and critics continue to question the Pima County (Ariz.) Sheriff's SWAT raid of a former Marine, even though he engaged officers with an AR-15.

June 30, 2011  |  by Robert O'Brien - Also by this author

The Pima County (Ariz.) Sheriff's SWAT raid that resulted in the shooting of a combat veteran and former Marine stirred up a hornet's nest of controversy with widespread criticism and condemnation of the tactical team.

Reading media and internet coverage of the May 5 raid may create the impression that the action was unwarranted overkill at the hands of an out-of-control Pima County SWAT team.

After weeks of public and media scrutiny, SWAT's actions were officially ruled "justifiable and reasonable." Additional information released portrays the former Marine in a very different light. A quick check of the Web indicates a dramatic, sudden decrease in the amount of anti-PCSD SWAT articles and comments.

Might this be due to speculation finally being replaced by facts? Therein lies an increasingly alarming problem. The rush to judgment — even before the facts are known — is fueled by speculation, guesswork and supposition. 

This can be dangerous, because the officers are pre-judged based on what people assume rather than what they know. The advent of cellphone video has helped launch people's judgment into uncharted territory, because people believe what they see with their own eyes. Are they seeing what really happened? Or are they getting only a partial view?

Recently released video of the entry shows SWAT's arrival, approach, and knock-and-announce entry followed by numerous, rapid gunshots.

What's not shown is who SWAT was shooting at or why they never made it past the entry point before the shooting erupted. All anyone knew in the beginning was that the officers had fired 71 bullets, which was widely condemned as overkill.

The agency attempted to explain that SWAT had been confronted by former Marine Jose Guerena, who pointed an AR-15 at them, which caused them to fire in self-defense. Why so many bullets? It was initially thought SWAT was fired upon until it was revealed that the AR-15's safety was on. This fanned the flames of speculation even more.

The fallout over this raid is far from over, because many people's minds were made up before the facts were known. The once-standard "no comment" response is long gone. Now, "under investigation" appears to be headed toward the same fate.

Anybody familiar with law enforcement agencies knows that officers involved in critical incidents are prohibited by departmental policy from talking publicly. We don't get to hear their side of the story.

We seem to be living in a time when whoever takes the offense and gets their version of the story out first forces the other side to have to defend itself against the accusations.

Today's reality is that the public, media, and critics increasingly want to know right away. Is this logical or even feasible in today's instant communication world? Conversely, what obligation do people and the media have while the facts of a situation are still being sorted out?

The reality is that investigations into complex, involved incidents require thoroughness and thoughtfulness to arrive at the truth of what happened.  In this case, the Pima County sheriff was widely viewed as ducking, stalling or hiding something. 

Now that the PCSD has released an in-depth, 500-page report and video of the initial approach, entry and shooting, what will satisfy the critics? Should knee-jerk response supersede proper, thorough investigations?

Let's all remind ourselves that people, including SWAT officers, are innocent until proven guilty.

Related:

Perception: The Difference Between Heroes and Villains

Ariz. SWAT Officers Cleared In Marine's Shooting (video)

Tags: Pima County (Ariz.) Sheriff, Media Misconduct


Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

DaveSAM25G @ 7/1/2011 12:46 AM

Well done! Trying to get the media to be "objective" is very difficult but worth pursuing because if the agency remains silent then everything you say takes place...I have seen the agenda's and am working an issue currently - addressed it...

We seem to be living in a time when whoever takes the offense and gets their version of the story out first forces the other side to have to defend itself against the accusations.

Your article:

Today's reality is that the public, media, and critics increasingly want to know right away. Is this logical or even feasible, even in today's instant communication world? Conversely, what obligation do people and the media have while the facts of a situation are still being sorted out?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What I found out thus far denial and NONE! "More like guilty until proven innocent!"

Det. Sgt. M.C. Williams @ 7/1/2011 10:06 AM

We can't get our own elected officials to read their own legislation (socialist health care bill, for example). Why then would we expect the media or the public we serve to read the 500 page after-action report? Our brother officers fired 71 rounds because that was what was necessary to neutralize the situation (and we don't have to wait for the switch to moved from "safe" to "fire" and hear a "boom" before defending ourselves).

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Blog Posts

Just What the Hell Are We Protecting?
I do wonder to what extent the federal employees among our ranks ask themselves whether or...
Remarkable Statistics on Officer Response to Active Shooter Incidents
The author reviews the PERF report on police response and results from 84 active shooter...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of over 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine