FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Tactical Pants - Galls
A popular choice for public safety professionals, the Galls Tactical Pants are...

Top News

N.J. Police Can Now Use Stun Guns in More Situations

March 04, 2016  | 

North Jersey law enforcement officials praised new guidelines Thursday that give officers broader discretion in deciding when to deploy stun guns, while a leading civil rights organization criticized them as giving too much power to police, reports

"I welcome the changes," Fort Lee Police Chief Keith Bendul said. "It's going to give us the ability to apply a less than lethal use of force option."

But Ari Rosmarin, public policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, said, "The new policy expands the authorization for the use of stun guns well beyond" the limits of what had been previously allowed. "We have little doubt this change will lead to increased – and deadly – use of stun guns," he said.

Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman announced changes to the state's policy regarding stun gun use Thursday, following input from community and law enforcement leaders and a review of incidences in which police have used the devices in New Jersey.

Under the new guidelines, police would be permitted to use stun guns - also known under the commercial name Tasers - on individuals who actively resist arrest and pose a "substantial" risk of causing bodily injury. The previous policy, which was considered one of the strictest in the nation, required an officer to establish that the suspect was likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, either to him or herself or to another person.

Police had complained that it was unrealistic to expect an officer in the field to predict the degree of injury that a suspect might inflict, Hoffman wrote in a letter to law enforcement officials. Requiring them to do so, he said, had had a chilling effect on officers, who opted not to deploy stun guns in situations where they might have helped de-escalate a confrontation. It has also discouraged police departments from equipping officers with the devices.

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Percy @ 3/4/2016 8:56 PM

More situations you say like.... kids parties, weddings, picnics, bar mitzvahs, christenings, family meals, bed times, in the shower, waiting for the bus, sitting at your desk at work etc etc. These weapons should be banned across the world, unless someone can be completely trained and certified ( and I don't mean certified cause you put it away after the last show and tell.) Try breaking a nail and/or a sweat once in a while.

Sheriffs Explorer Sgt. @ 3/29/2016 10:14 PM

The ACLU again. They're dead wrong. If someone is being confrontational with the Police they need to taze him. Its better than shooting the guy. Percy, you say tazers should be banned? Well how about guns too. They hurt more. While you're at it King Percy the 1st, why don't you ban Police Officers too. They're the ones who use these weapons.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
Police Magazine