FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Tactical Pants - Galls
A popular choice for public safety professionals, the Galls Tactical Pants are...

Reviews : Arsenal

Don't Believe the Hype

Hearsay and rumor can lead you to make unwise decisions about guns, calibers, and ammo types.

May 01, 2004  |  by Roy Huntington

The same is true of the guns themselves. It seems every few months the major makers are offering new "black-plastic wunder-guns" aimed at the law enforcement market. Each promises to solve all your problems and definitely makes whatever you're carrying now obsolete. Just ask the salesman who is calling on your agency.

Think about it for a moment: You probably felt perfectly fine with your current duty arsenal, heard the hype, or that "war story" about an ammo "failure," and suddenly you can't rest until you "upgrade" to the new ".30 Magnum Hang-Fire L/E Anti-Terror" gun. Take a breath, and examine it calmly.

Don’t let a knee-jerk reaction to rumor or misinformation cause a caliber or ammo change—if you don’t really need to change.

For Change's Sake

If we didn't embrace positive change, we'd still be carrying S&W Model 10 .38 Special revolvers. Actually, the funny thing is I never felt "undergunned" when I carried one. And bad guys had much the same arsenal available to them then as they do now.

Change for the positive-and change that actually makes sense and a real difference-should be applauded. But especially in this day of critically short police department budgets, is a move from, for instance, your existing 9mm duty guns to a .40, .45, or other caliber really necessary?

After 24 years as a cop and about 30 total years "in the business" either selling equipment, buying it for my agency, using it in the field, manufacturing it, writing about it, or consulting with a cross-section of major makers on how to sell products, I can tell you with no hesitation that often change is not needed.

Hard words. But ask any senior trainer on your agency what they've seen and I promise they'll tell you the same thing. Major technology breakthroughs aside, what happens most often is a change from one vendor or maker to another, with little or-most often-no real gain in either performance, value, or reliability. Making such a change, however, often  appeases a perceived need, which makes everyone feel better, but doesn't necessarily do a better job in the field.

Baseline Needs

With the advent of the Mobile Data Terminal in the cars of my old agency, field police work took a leap forward. No longer was it necessary to wait in endless lines on the radio to get your turn to "run" suspects, identify possibly stolen property, check a criminal history, and more. That was a great breakthrough. But as the years passed, we created a generation of young cops who, often, could not do street-level police work if the computer system went down.

I stopped to cover a young officer once who was about to let a car thief go. The officer told me he was pretty sure the suspect was an auto thief, but didn't think the car he was driving was stolen and couldn't verify it since the system was "down." I was stunned. "You're not going to let him go, are you?" I asked. "Well, ah, yeah, I was," he replied. What followed was a minor lesson in basic interview techniques, how to find an alternate VIN number, and listening to that "sixth" sense we all develop. The car was indeed stolen; the suspect was arrested; and it was all done without the MDT.

Which is a roundabout way to gently remind us all that most usually, sound tactics backed up with reliable hardware can get the job done.

With today's high-performance ammo, any caliber is capable of meeting most threats. For instance, there was a rush of word-of-mouth gossip about sub-sonic 9mm 147-grain "failures" in the field a few years ago. When the real data was examined, this load didn't seem to account for more problems in the field than any other load or caliber.

When you hear such rumors about ammo, guns, or related equipment, check for true "failures" of the design, load, or equipment at your own agency. If you hear of problems elsewhere, ask for documentation and talk to the people involved. Pretend you're conducting a police investigation. Could you "charge" your own agency's equipment with a "crime" by the end of the investigation? If not, then reevaluate the need for change. In actuality, did the investigation begin due to rumor rather than a real problem? You may save your agency tens of thousands of dollars-or more.

Gun magazine hysteria about load "failures," advertising that sounds too good to be true, locker room stories without reliable backing (often with editorial comment from unqualified bystanders), and media distortion all often pave the way to equipment changes that are not needed. Use your investigative skills and your sixth sense to get to the truth. Then, and only then, make a change.

Roy Huntington is the editor of American Handgunner and a long-time member of the Police Advisory Board.

«   Page 2 of 2   »

Request more info about this product / service / company

Be the first to comment on this story

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Gun Control, "Assault Weapons," and School Safety
Law enforcement officers are strong supporters of the Second Amendment and do not support...

Police Magazine