FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cobalt Software Platform - Mark43
Mark43's Cobalt software platform unites a set of law enforcement tools securely...

 

Demystifying the Convergence of LTE and LMR Networks for First Responders

Brought to you by:

View now!

Originally aired: Thursday, December 6, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

Narrowband Land Mobile Radio (LMR) networks and user radio equipment have been the cornerstone of mobile communications for First Responders for decades. The trend from traditional analog to more robust wireless broadband networks in recent years has improved the overall accessibility but questions remain on whether the new networks can provide all the required capabilities First Responders need to do their job.

Increasing demand for bandwidth intensive applications such as video, advanced mapping and analytics, alongside critical voice communications has been driving adoption of broadband LTE cellular networks, such as FirstNet.

Join our panel of industry experts for this insightful 60-minute on-demand webinar as they discuss the critical differences between LMR networks and LTE networking, how these technologies can successfully co-exist, and explore the future of critical communications for First Responders.

In this session, you will learn:

  • Current and future industry trends for LTE and LMR technologies
  • Challenges and obstacles with the convergence of technologies
  • Real-life examples of successful hybrid communication strategies for First Responders
  • Recommendations for future proofing your agency; adoption of new technologies and how to bridge the gap

Speakers:

Tony Morris, VP North American Sales, Enterprise Solutions, Sierra Wireless

Jesus Gonzalez, Analyst II, Critical Communications, IHS Markit

Ken Rehbehn, Principal Analyst, Critical Communications Insights

Andrew Seybold, Senior Partner, Andrew Seybold Inc.

View now!

6 Key Findings of Incident Reporting

Brought to you by:

View now!

Originally aired: Thursday, December 13, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

An exceeding number of police departments and law enforcement agencies, whose officers spend upwards of 3-4 hours a day completing incident reports and other time-sensitive paperwork*, are turning to smarter tools, such as speech recognition solutions, to help transform their police reporting workflows.

View this on-demand webinar to hear why these law enforcement professionals are embracing smarter tools to complete higher-quality reports and move mission-critical information within the CAD/RMS faster and more efficiently – all by voice.

This discussion will provide you with an understanding of:

  • What law enforcement has to say about current reporting processes
  • Why officers, especially recruits, want smarter tools to help with police paperwork
  • Why manual reporting has a negative impact on report accuracy and productivity and can hinder criminal proceedings
  • How departments can speed up data entry within the CAD/RMs and move mission-critical information more accurately and efficiently
  • How speech recognition technology can help increase officer safety and improve situational awareness and productivity on patrol
  • Why embracing smarter technology increases community visibility, and minimizes costs

Learn how your department can make incident reporting faster, safer and more complete by viewing our on-demand webinar today.


*Role of Technology in Law Enforcement Paperwork Survey 

Speakers:

Eric La Scola, Product Marketing Manager, Dragon, Nuance

Top News

Wash. Agency Sued Over Jail Video Surveillance

August 26, 2013  | 

Screenshot via KING 5.
Screenshot via KING 5.
A dozen people arrested for drunk driving have sued the Puyallup (Wash.) Police Department for video recordings showing them naked while using the bathroom or changing.

Seattle attorney James Egan, who's representing the 11 women and one man, told KING 5 the victims appear to mostly be attractive women. Egan's co-counsel said the officers viewing the footage could be considered "peeping Toms."

Several of the women were recorded on the jail's video surveillance system changing into a standard-issue jail uniform. The city's attorney said video surveillance in jails is common practice and the lawsuit is baseless.


Comments (17)

Displaying 1 - 17 of 17

top rad @ 8/26/2013 7:28 PM

If you're in jail, you have no right to privacy.

equaljustice @ 8/27/2013 3:18 PM

I bet the cameras are out in the open and not hidden. No expectation of privacy in jail or any other government facility.

David Armstrong @ 8/27/2013 3:22 PM

You don't give up all rights just because you are in jail, and the needs of the facility have to be balanced against the rights of the suspects. Hard to explain what possible need is being met by videoing people going to the bathroom, especially if the video appear to be selective in nature rather than used for all inmates.

JM @ 8/27/2013 3:43 PM

If you've ever seen an inmate hanging dead in a holding cell, beating a cellmate, etc., you would understand the need for cameras...

David ?? @ 8/27/2013 4:34 PM

I agree JM. Everywhere I have ever worked, we recorded 24/7.

David ?? @ 8/27/2013 4:39 PM

FYI , we did not record the changing room, from civvies to jail uniform. Everyone was searched to prevent bringing in contraband .
Guns, Drugs and Cellular Phones.

Ima Leprechaun @ 8/27/2013 6:08 PM

Most jail camera's even in the open are angled as to not spy on people with their private parts exposed to the camera. This really is a violation of privacy and the agency involved knew it. Whether in jail or not, there is an expected right of privacy while on the toilet, in the shower or in a changing area. Generally, that's why those areas are so heavily guarded and anyone entering those areas should be throughly searched prior to entry to avoid mishaps. Even the small jails in remote parts of the USA know this type of video intrusion is improper. Also it makes you wonder just how these videos were made public in the first place, that alone shows the intent to deprive privacy.

Leonard Mather @ 8/27/2013 7:32 PM

Ima Leprechaun and David Armstrong should get together, find a nice place to live in CA and contact Rev. Al and Jesse to have a talk about the complaint. Meanwhile, I hope the PD hires someone like Gerry Spence (he never lost a case since 1969 until retiring in 2010). It is a frivolous lawsuit.

Leonard Mather @ 8/27/2013 7:36 PM

Ima Leprechaun and David Armstrong should team up, go to California together and contact Rev. Al and Jesse to discuss this matter. In the mean time, I hope the Police Department hires someone like Gerry Spence--he never lost a case since 1969 until he retired in 2010. It is a frivolous lawsuit.

Leonard Mather @ 8/27/2013 7:38 PM

It sounds like a frivolous lawsuit to me. If the likes of Gerry Spence could be hired, the latter would be the finding. Gerry never lost a case since 1969 until he retired in 2010.

Leonard Mather @ 8/27/2013 7:43 PM

My sincere apologies for the repetition. I erroneously thought I was being deleted due to a glitch in my keyboard. It has been corrected. Haste makes waste. Lesson learned.

madog 81 mm @ 8/28/2013 4:22 AM

Intoxicated people , caught with their pants down, ( pun intended ) now wanting to sue the jails ! I wonder how many stripped in the public eye, or revealed their privates while in the act of relieving themselves in front of a bar or on the street itself? A jail can be a dangerous place for any one , including intoxicated drivers ! Monitoring has to be be done , preferably by same sex officers , as much as possible ! Imagine the law suits for not paying attention to those suicidal , or helpless , and intoxicated individuals ! If some one has a better idea, guarding these people, then suggest it ! Taking a drunk off the street , is a public service , as prevention for , death or injury to all those involved ! There is no expectation of privacy when you are intoxicated enough to be arrested for it ! Drink moderately , "don't drive after consumming" , and we'll all be safer , for it ! It's incombent on LEOs , that they must be responsible for the welfare of arrestees! All be safe !

Steve @ 8/28/2013 6:55 AM

Ever thought about the issue of contraband brought into the jail? Happens all the time. Females are more likely to have the contraband than males as their wardrobe and "hiding places" aren't always searched thoroughly by male officers or jail personnel. That's one (good reason) for the video surveillence.
If it were proven that only "attractive" females were being videod...now we've got a different issue!

Jager357 @ 8/28/2013 7:48 AM

Puyallup Police Department will most likley lose if they go to court. A female officer sued her own department and won because male officers looked at her dl photo. It's not the recording of people in jail being challanged, it's the number of officers watching the videos that have no business watching them.

Chuck in KC @ 8/28/2013 8:13 AM

Ima Leprechaun is a chronic whiner and complainer and police-hater. His rants are always anti-law enforcement and should just be ignored.

Chuck in KC @ 8/28/2013 8:16 AM

The cameras are not hidden and inmates are totally aware they are being video-taped. The video is for use in court if something happens and is evidence. Most systems only keep the video until storage space runs out and is then deleted. This is no big thing, unless the officers made a separate tape of the video and were viewing it outside of the facility. There is not enough information on this little snippet of news to know the whole story.

Rev. Lowrey @ 8/28/2013 2:17 PM

It seems some commenters believe that "attractive" women have more rights than "unattractive" women or men.
Aside from beauty/attractiveness being in the eye of the beholder, these attitudes are wrong at a foundational level.
Regardless of the value of surveillance for safety or any other legitimate reason, making a special class for women some officer or other deems attractive shows both bias and a basic lack of understanding of civil or human "rights".
I doubt much jail crime takes place during evacuation.
It will be interesting to see how the case actually turns out.
Apparently, jail is not the only government toilet where you get filmed.

http://ludingtoncitizen.ning.com/forum/topics/ludington-city-government-they-see-you-poo-in-public

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

Dragon Nuance to Hold Webinar on Improving Report Writing Efficiency through Speech Recognition Technology
Dragon Nuance will hold a webinar titled "Transforming Police Reporting with Speech...
NYPD Deploying 14 Drones, Activists Oppose Plan
"Drone technology will give our cops and their incident commanders an opportunity to see...
Orion Labs’ Push-to-Talk Application Now FirstNet Certified
Orion Labs today announced that its Orion Push to Talk iOS 5.2.8 mobile application is now...
PowerDMS to Host Inaugural User Conference, ENTRUST 2019
Former Navy Seal Rich Diviney and ethics expert Chuck Gallagher will keynote PowerDMS'...
NITV FS Unveils Computer Voice Stress Analyzer III
The CVSA III was developed to be "the" 21st Century truth verification system for law...

Police Magazine