FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cobalt Software Platform - Mark43
Mark43's Cobalt software platform unites a set of law enforcement tools securely...

No upcoming webinars scheduled

Columns : Editorial

A Really Dumb Idea

Sorry, President Obama, but smart guns are not ready for duty and they won't be anytime soon.

June 09, 2016  |  by - Also by this author

Photo: Kelly Bracken
Photo: Kelly Bracken

The smart gun, a weapon that can only be fired by its owner or assigned user, is one of those gee-whiz technologies that many people believe could revolutionize the world like driverless cars, hypersonic jets, and autonomous humanoid robots. All of these technologies will probably be part of our lives sometime in the coming decades. But some people such as President Barack Obama, who announced in April a law enforcement smart gun initiative, are trying to rush smart guns into your duty holsters long before they are ready for duty.

Proponents of smart gun technology argue that it could reduce accidental shootings, the use of stolen firearms by criminals, and suicides, unless the suicidal person is using his or her own weapon. Most importantly, it's believed that smart guns would prevent deadly gun grab attacks against law enforcement officers. And that's of course a good thing that we at POLICE Magazine heartily support.

The problem with the push to develop smart gun systems and replace law enforcement duty weapons with firearms fitted with the technology is that it may do very little to prevent gun grabs and could make police operations even more dangerous. Worse, although proponents of developing smart weapons tout officer safety as a benefit, they may have far different agendas.

To understand why this particular cure for gun grabs may actually be worse than the disease, we have to take a look at the existing technologies for personalizing a firearm to a user or users.

Smart gun prototypes that have already been developed use radio frequency identification (RFID), magnetic locks, or biometrics to unlock their triggers and transform them from non-functional to functional. And all of them are likely to experience an unacceptable level of failure or authentication lag in a gunfight.

RFID and magnetic smart guns both require the shooter to wear an object such as a ring or watch to unlock the gun. In the RFID system a receiver in the gun picks up radio frequencies from the wearable object to identify the wearer as an authorized user of the firearm and unlocks the trigger. Magnetic systems use magnets to lock the trigger and the wearable acts as a key. These systems might work just fine on the range, but in actual operations they have numerous issues. They are electronic devices so they have to survive rain and dust and the shock produced by a firing handgun or they will fail. Also, the designers of these devices need to consider what happens in a gunfight and realize that the wearables that unlock the triggers in these systems could be damaged or even shot away from the user's body in combat.

Similar problems make biometric smart gun authentication less than practical on a defensive weapon. Smart gun advocates, including Obama, believe the same kinds of fingerprint scanners used on smartphones can be adapted for firearm authentication. Which is absurd. Half the time my iPhone fingerprint scanner doesn't work, sometimes because of a hair or dust. So I cringe to think about a similar technology on an officer's handgun when seconds count and there may not be time to wipe away the sweat, blood, water, and other fluids that might obscure it in a deadly force situation. Worse, even when the thing works there is a fraction of a second lag before it unlocks the phone. Fractions of seconds are really important in a shootout.

I firmly believe that eventually there may be a smart gun technology that works for law enforcement duty guns. But none of the current means of authentication used in smart guns is fail-safe enough to be practical on defensive weapons.

Maybe the inventors and designers will, because of the push from the Obama administration, create a viable smart gun that will eliminate the danger of gun grab attacks on officers. But I'm afraid the real deaths that the Obama administration is trying to prevent with its push for smart guns are those of so-called "unarmed" persons who try to take officers' pistols, not those of officers killed by such attacks.

No one on the anti-gun, anti-police side of politics seems to understand—or at least won't admit—that a gun grab is attempted murder. And now the same people fail to understand that the best way for people to prevent themselves from getting killed while grabbing an officer's gun is to not grab the officer's gun. Teaching people that lesson would save a lot more officer and suspect lives than any smart gun technology.


Comments (8)

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8

Charlie @ 6/20/2016 12:14 AM

Nice blog.

kevcopAz @ 6/21/2016 4:33 PM

If this is forced upon LEOs before the weapons are functionally perfect, then at the least the manufacturer, the department, as well as the city or political entity that forces its use it should all be liable financially in the millions of dollars automatically if an officers weapon fails. This would make the manufacturers run away immediately from developing this lawsuit nightmare of a weapon.

Carlson @ 6/21/2016 5:51 PM

Rfid is particularly concerning. RF jammers are already common. How long will it take the crooks to get devices that render all cop guns in an area inert?

JIM DONAHUE @ 6/22/2016 2:46 AM

You hit the nail on the head, David.

Bob retired leo @ 6/22/2016 8:59 AM

We were talking about this a few days ago. There are to many what ifs..... what if the battery goes dead, what if the print reader on the gun is wet, and cant read the print, like you, we discussed jammers, some have a ring the officer wears to active the gun, what of they get the jump on him in a mugging off duty and take his jewelry, now they can take the gun if they recognize new technology. This is one safety concern where there can be no change, the old way works best. A real old fashioned sidearm used by an Officer with a real brain and not some mechanical gismo. The politicians sit on their brains and pass laws from their desks while the cop on the job is the one whose life is on the line. "Real cops, Real guns.... its as simple as that!!!

GP Cobb @ 6/22/2016 9:33 AM

@Bob, and a good reliable 9 shot .357 Revolver...............

Robert @ 6/24/2016 9:35 PM

Make them coin operated.....

PS I am joking.

Sgt. Mike @ 6/27/2016 9:43 AM

I actually laughed out loud Robert. Bravo!

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Speed Enforcement Tools 2017
These products help law enforcement monitor drivers' speeds and keep communities safer.

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine