FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cobalt Software Platform - Mark43
Mark43's Cobalt software platform unites a set of law enforcement tools securely...


6 Key Findings of Incident Reporting

Brought to you by:

Register now!

Thursday, December 13, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

An exceeding number of police departments and law enforcement agencies, whose officers spend upwards of 3-4 hours a day completing incident reports and other time-sensitive paperwork*, are turning to smarter tools, such as speech recognition solutions, to help transform their police reporting workflows.

Join us on Thursday, December 13, 2018 at 2:00 PM ET to hear why these law enforcement professionals are embracing smarter tools to complete higher-quality reports and move mission-critical information within the CAD/RMS faster and more efficiently – all by voice.

This discussion will provide you with an understanding of:

  • What law enforcement has to say about current reporting processes
  • Why officers, especially recruits, want smarter tools to help with police paperwork
  • Why manual reporting has a negative impact on report accuracy and productivity and can hinder criminal proceedings
  • How departments can speed up data entry within the CAD/RMs and move mission-critical information more accurately and efficiently
  • How speech recognition technology can help increase officer safety and improve situational awareness and productivity on patrol
  • Why embracing smarter technology increases community visibility, and minimizes costs

Learn how your department can make incident reporting faster, safer and more complete by registering for our webinar today.

*Role of Technology in Law Enforcement Paperwork Survey 


Eric La Scola, Product Marketing Manager, Dragon, Nuance

Register now!

Demystifying the Convergence of LTE and LMR Networks for First Responders

Brought to you by:

View now!

Originally aired: Thursday, December 6, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

Narrowband Land Mobile Radio (LMR) networks and user radio equipment have been the cornerstone of mobile communications for First Responders for decades. The trend from traditional analog to more robust wireless broadband networks in recent years has improved the overall accessibility but questions remain on whether the new networks can provide all the required capabilities First Responders need to do their job.

Increasing demand for bandwidth intensive applications such as video, advanced mapping and analytics, alongside critical voice communications has been driving adoption of broadband LTE cellular networks, such as FirstNet.

Join our panel of industry experts for this insightful 60-minute on-demand webinar as they discuss the critical differences between LMR networks and LTE networking, how these technologies can successfully co-exist, and explore the future of critical communications for First Responders.

In this session, you will learn:

  • Current and future industry trends for LTE and LMR technologies
  • Challenges and obstacles with the convergence of technologies
  • Real-life examples of successful hybrid communication strategies for First Responders
  • Recommendations for future proofing your agency; adoption of new technologies and how to bridge the gap


Tony Morris, VP North American Sales, Enterprise Solutions, Sierra Wireless

Jesus Gonzalez, Analyst II, Critical Communications, IHS Markit

Ken Rehbehn, Principal Analyst, Critical Communications Insights

Andrew Seybold, Senior Partner, Andrew Seybold Inc.

Columns : Editorial

Viewing Video: Just Press Play

In the interest of accuracy officers who wear body cameras on duty must have access to the video before they write their reports.

August 06, 2015  |  by - Also by this author

Last month my Facebook page lit up with a bunch of friends posting their memories of the Apollo 11 landing and subsequent moonwalk by astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin. My friends' posts about the moonshot have me thinking about memories and how they work and how they get clouded by a variety of factors, including time, trauma, and bias, and what that can mean for law enforcement officers in this current hypercritical anti-police environment.

You see, outside of some extremely personal stuff like the deaths of my parents and some extremely traumatic stuff like 9/11, the moonshot was one of the most momentous events of my life. And the terrible thing is that I'm not even sure what I remember of it.

I was 10 when Neil Armstrong walked down a short ladder from the lunar landing module into the dust of the moon. But my parents let me stay up late into the night to watch it. And I vividly remember sitting with my Dad on the couch in our old house and watching it on a black-and-white TV. But I'm not really sure if I remember what I saw on that TV.

The point here is that memory is both fluid and fragile. So it's unrealistic for people to expect anyone to remember anything, no matter how momentous or traumatic in 100% high-definition detail. But that's what some activists are demanding of police officers following the trauma of a shooting or otherwise violent use of force.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other police critics have been extremely vocal in advocating that law enforcement officers not be able to review the video captured on their body-worn or in-car video systems before writing their reports. This is quite frankly an asinine stance by police critics and no agency should listen to this nonsense.

Denying officers access to the video records of incidents before they write their reports serves only one purpose: It's a trap. The goal here is to play "gotcha" with the officers and try to catch them in a lie. Which is disgusting. The goal of any official report should be to document the facts whether they are from the memory of the officer or from the video.

Our brains are not DVRs, not even for the most pleasant and memorable events of our lives and certainly not for trauma. Memory is flawed and it often makes traumatic events worse than they actually were. What we perceive as the truth of traumatic events is affected by body chemistry, speed of the action, and the fact that each person only sees the event from his or her perspective.

An officer's memory can be extremely flawed not out of desire to cover his or her ass after a shooting but because human memory is flawed. When I was in college, criminal justice and psychology professors used to like to have someone burst into class suddenly and depart just as suddenly and then ask their students what they remembered about the person. Hardly anybody remembered enough for a good description. Of course, law enforcement officers are trained observers and likely would do better on such an exercise, but expecting them to have photographic memories under combat stress is inhuman in the truest sense of the word; it is expecting officers to behave like machines.

It's been documented time and again that officers cannot be expected to remember everything that happened during use-of-force incidents because the stress they experience during those incidents plays havoc with memories. Scientists have documented a series of almost hallucinatory perceptions that sometimes happen to people under live-or-die combat stress. Officers involved in shootings have experienced auditory exclusion where they heard the sharp cracks of rounds fired from their duty pistols as near silent "pops." Auditory exclusion may also be why many officers remember firing only two or three rounds when questioned about shootings where they pulled the trigger many more times. Officers have also seen impossible things during combat such as 9mm casings the size of beer cans flying past their eyes.

It's critically important for every law enforcement agency to recognize that officers' memories of certain incidents will never be perfect and officers should have access to their body camera and in-car videos as they write their reports. Chiefs and sheriffs have to fight off movements by activists to play "gotcha" with officers because memory is not all it's cracked up to be.

Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Jon Retired LEO @ 8/8/2015 7:56 PM

Excellent article, I agree whole heartedly.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Police Magazine