FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Cobalt Software Platform - Mark43
Mark43's Cobalt software platform unites a set of law enforcement tools securely...

Transforming Police Reporting with Speech Recognition Technology

Brought to you by:

Register now!

Wednesday, November 28, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

An exceeding number of police departments and law enforcement agencies, whose officers spend upwards of 3-4 hours a day completing incident reports and other time-sensitive paperwork*, are turning to smarter tools, such as speech recognition solutions, to help transform their police reporting workflows.

Join us on Wednesday, November 28, 2018 at 2:00 PM ET to hear why these law enforcement professionals are embracing smarter tools to complete higher-quality reports and move mission-critical information within the CAD/RMS faster and more efficiently – all by voice.

This discussion will provide you with an understanding of:

  • What law enforcement has to say about current reporting processes
  • Why officers, especially recruits, want smarter tools to help with police paperwork
  • Why manual reporting has a negative impact on report accuracy and productivity and can hinder criminal proceedings
  • How departments can speed up data entry within the CAD/RMs and move mission-critical information more accurately and efficiently
  • How speech recognition technology can help increase officer safety and improve situational awareness and productivity on patrol
  • Why embracing smarter technology increases community visibility, and minimizes costs

Learn how your department can make incident reporting faster, safer and more complete by registering for our webinar today.

*Role of Technology in Law Enforcement Paperwork Survey 


Eric La Scola, Product Marketing Manager, Dragon, Nuance

Register now!

Demystifying the Convergence of LTE and LMR Networks for First Responders

Brought to you by:

Register now!

Thursday, December 6, 2018 -- 11:00 AM PT/2:00 PM ET

Narrowband Land Mobile Radio (LMR) networks and user radio equipment have been the cornerstone of mobile communications for First Responders for decades. The trend from traditional analog to more robust wireless broadband networks in recent years has improved the overall accessibility but questions remain on whether the new networks can provide all the required capabilities First Responders need to do their job.

Increasing demand for bandwidth intensive applications such as video, advanced mapping and analytics, alongside critical voice communications has been driving adoption of broadband LTE cellular networks, such as FirstNet.

Join our panel of industry experts for this insightful 60-minute webinar as they discuss the critical differences between LMR networks and LTE networking, how these technologies can successfully co-exist, and explore the future of critical communications for First Responders.

In this webinar, you will learn:

  • Current and future industry trends for LTE and LMR technologies
  • Challenges and obstacles with the convergence of technologies
  • Real-life examples of successful hybrid communication strategies for First Responders
  • Recommendations for future proofing your agency; adoption of new technologies and how to bridge the gap


Tony Morris, VP North American Sales, Enterprise Solutions, Sierra Wireless

Jesus Gonzalez, Analyst II, Critical Communications, IHS Markit

Ken Rehbehn, Principal Analyst, Critical Communications Insights

Andrew Seybold, Senior Partner, Andrew Seybold Inc.

Columns : Guest Editorial

Body Cameras: Keep It Real

No technology will ever capture all of the evidence of an officer's use of force or shooting.

June 30, 2015  |  by Greg Meyer

Greg Meyer
Greg Meyer

Body-worn cameras will be a game-changer just as body-worn radios, ballistic vests, and TASERs were game-changers in years past.

But no new law enforcement technology is the be-all, end-all "silver bullet" that people often think it will be. Body-worn radios changed our tactics and improved our safety as long as we didn't over-rely on them and take chances we would not have taken before. Ballistic vests have saved many lives, but not all officers wear them, which means some officers are still dying from shots to the torso that would have been stopped by vests. TASERs have prevented many shootings and other major uses of force, but are sometimes used in situations in which they should not be. All of these tools have required policy and training adaptations as we translate the concept to the reality.

And so it will be with body cameras. They will be a very valuable tool. But it won't always be the video they capture that will be the most useful evidence.

I predict that the audio of many incidents will be more important than the video. Having already seen several body camera incidents in my consulting work, it is often the case that the camera is not pointing at the action while the officer is running or fighting or shooting. But the audio picks up the sounds of the incident, including the words of the officer and the suspect, the sounds of the TASER or the baton strikes or the gunshots, and when someone is out of breath.

Body camera footage will often be persuasive evidence against your suspect when he or she is facing a judge and jury. And if you are unlucky enough to be sued or prosecuted, body camera footage may be a big factor in establishing your credibility, just as cellphone video, security video, and dash-cam video already are.

One of the great advantages of body cameras is they will help protect you against false complaints by members of the public who don't like what you did. But when I mentioned the value of body cameras in helping prosecute people who make false complaints against police during a national meeting of police executives in 2013, the deputy attorney general from the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division nearly had a coronary. She stood up and responded that "The Civil Rights Division would never support the prosecution of citizens who make false complaints against police officers." We have a new attorney general, Loretta Lynch, now, and hopefully that anti-police attitude will change. Time will tell.

I have seen many articles on the advantages and limitations of body cameras in the past few years, and have produced a couple of seminars on the subject. One of the most important articles on the subject that I have seen appeared in the May 2015 issue of The Police Chief, which is the magazine of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). The article is titled, "Efficacy of Police Body Cameras for Evidentiary Purposes: Fact or Fallacy?" and was written by Lt. Col. Craig E. Geis, U.S. Army (ret.), and David M. Blake of the California Training Institute.

The IACP article highlights the fact that the various models of police body cameras have a field of view ranging from 95 degrees to 170 degrees; but, the "normal useful field of view in human vision, the area from which information can be extracted at a brief glance without eye or head movements, is 55 to 60 degrees under optimal, normal stress." Thus, the camera will record more information and at a higher quality than a human can see. The camera does not have a heart, or adrenalin, or the ability to perceive things, or a fear of death or great bodily injury. "Hence, human perception and memory of an event can be dramatically different than what is recorded by the camera. This difference increases substantially when the stress and arousal of a use-of-force or officer-involved shooting event is a factor."

One more prediction: Academic studies of body camera footage in the coming years will show that you are doing an excellent job handling the challenges that come with your daily work. The irrational, violent, resistive, assaultive people you encounter will be there for all to see (or hear). The vast majority who submit peacefully to your arrest will also be there.

Greg Meyer is a retired Los Angeles Police Department captain and a member of the POLICE Advisory Board.

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Bill Wylie @ 7/5/2015 1:30 PM

Absolute Horse manure. The second guessing and finger pointing will only produce louder and more vitriol. Policing is a contact sport and even lawful action, Ferguson, NYPD etc produces hate and distrust. People don't want to see violence at all.... Are you even serious writing all that AND watch lawful police actions start RIOTS. This is ridiculous.

westcoastleo @ 7/29/2015 3:58 PM

Body cameras KEEP IT REAL?

In the Ohio case today an officer is being charged with murder. He was wearing a camera...

Where are the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) during this case mister Meyer? You are a dreamer..

Maybe if you dont work and enforce the laws body cameras will work...

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Can You Legally Counter a Drone?
What can you do to protect the public and yourself from drones?

Police Magazine