Planned Operations and Dogs

Some SWAT teams have become very adept at using non-lethal tools to neutralize the threat presented by dogs. Retired Cleveland SWAT entry team leader Robert O'Brien says that long before the Hells Angels case and its nearly $2 million in settlements his SWAT team always considered the presence of dogs in its planning. O'Brien's tool of choice for getting the dogs out of the way was the fire extinguisher.

David Griffith 2017 Headshot

Planned law enforcement operation that involve locations guarded by dogs must include non-lethal means for neutralizing the dogs such as fire extinguishers and catch poles. Here, a Chicago animal control officer demonstrates use of a catch pole on a friendly animal.(Photo: National Canine Research Council)Planned law enforcement operation that involve locations guarded by dogs must include non-lethal means for neutralizing the dogs such as fire extinguishers and catch poles. Here, a Chicago animal control officer demonstrates use of a catch pole on a friendly animal.(Photo: National Canine Research Council)

SWAT officers commonly encounter hostile dogs during operations such as raids and high-risk warrant service. And sometimes they shoot and kill dogs during these operations.

But these tactical units should be aware that under the law—especially in jurisdictions covered by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit—planned operations in which dogs are killed have a higher standard for reasonable use of force than impromptu law enforcement actions. This is because of a lawsuit stemming from dogs killed by police during a 1998 operation on a Hells Angels club house and several members' homes in and around San Jose, Calif.

During entry into the targeted homes, the officers shot and killed a Rottweiler and two bull-mastiffs. The dog owners sued. And the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let the suit go forward. In 2005 after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the Ninth Circuit decision, Santa Clara County settled for $990,000 and the City of San Jose settled for $800,000. The cities of Santa Clara and Gilroy had already paid total damages of about $50,000.

The bottom line is that if the pre-operation surveillance reveals the presence of dogs, you need to account for how to get around them or through them without killing them.

Some SWAT teams have become very adept at using non-lethal tools to neutralize the threat presented by dogs. Retired Cleveland SWAT entry team leader Robert O'Brien says that long before the Hells Angels case and its nearly $2 million in settlements his SWAT team always considered the presence of dogs in its planning. O'Brien's tool of choice for getting the dogs out of the way was the fire extinguisher.

"I employed CO2 fire extinguishers numerous times with great success against attacking, charging dogs, including pit bulls, Rottweilers, Dobermans, and German shepherds," says O'Brien, who adds Cleveland SWAT learned this tactic from LAPD SWAT.

O'Brien says he used CO2 fire extinguishers on dogs an average of 100 times per year over 20 years and found them to be very effective. "It works on dogs three ways: the noise, the cloud, and the cold in their very sensitive noses," he explains. Cleveland SWAT continues the practice today, O'Brien adds.

While fire extinguishers back the dogs off and sometimes make them run away, O'Brien says teams need an option for what to do when the dog runs into a corner and remains a threat.

"We started training with and using the capture nooses used by animal control," he says. "The combination of a CO2 fire extinguisher holding the dog at bay and the capture noose, made it easy to remove them out of the corners."

About the Author
David Griffith 2017 Headshot
Editor
View Bio
Page 1 of 502
Next Page