FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Top News

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Public Has No Right to Record Officers on Duty

August 11, 2017  | 

In a free speech ruling that contradicts six other federal circuit courts, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a district court ruling that says Americans do not have a First Amendment right to videotape the police, or any public official, in public.

The court of appeals filed the opinion July 25. The ruling is only applicable in the Eighth Circuit, which encompasses: the Eastern District of Arkansas, the Western District of Arkansas, the Northern District of Iowa, the Southern District of Iowa, the District of Minnesota, the Eastern District of Missouri, the Western District of Missouri, the District of Nebraska, the District of North Dakota, and the District of South Dakota. Other federal courts of appeal have ruled that people do have a First Amendment right to record public officials while they are performing their duties, including officers.

The case stemmed from a lawsuit brought by Matthew Akins of Columbia, MO, who has had numerous run-ins with police as he attempted to videotape them pulling cars over and making arrests. Akins was typically standing on public property such as a street or sidewalk while videotaping the encounters. Akins was videotaping the encounters on behalf of a group called Citizens for Justice, which he founded in 2010, KCRG TV reports.

According to his lawyer, Stephen Wyse, Akins was threatened numerous times for his actions, his employer was hassled, and he was ordered to stop videotaping by police on several occasions. He had charges filed against him, many of which were later dropped, according to the Eighth Circuit ruling.

Akins sued Boone County Prosecutor Dan Knight and several Columbia police officers, citing violations of his First, Second, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

This contradictory ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is likely to trigger a U.S. Supreme Court review of this issue.

Officers should make sure they know applicable law in their jurisdictions before interfering with a person recording them on duty. Doing so can result in a civil rights lawsuit.


Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

kevcopaz @ 8/12/2017 8:32 AM

This goes to prove how some judges are not in sync with the others, but I guess thats whatvthe Supremes are for. I would guess the answer is somewhere in the middle. If the public servant is in the public eye (not an invasion into privet conversations etc) and the person filming has the right to be there, then it should be legal. The point in contention is does the persons actions interfere with what the public servant is doing?. If it does or even "may" cause added danger or the possibility of making the servants job harder or likely unsafe then there should a law to prevent it. Otherwise this would be the same as if anyone was filming anyone else in public, possibly including media. That cant happen, this is a free society. I realize as a cop its a pain in the A__ but we have to remember we do serve the public and this is a free country, or should.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

Suspect in Shooting of 2 MO Officers in Custody After Standoff
Two St. Louis-area police officers were saved by their body armor Thursday morning when...
Video: MO Teen Charge with Stabbing K-9 Faces Maximum Penalty of 15 Days in Jail
The deputy handling Champ heard a bark and a yelp. Wilbanks was tracked down a short time...
Video: Michigan Officers Face Internal Investigation Over Handcuffing of 11-Year-Old Girl
"Listening to the 11-year-old's response makes my stomach turn. It makes me physically...
Video: Seattle Police Release Footage of Vehicle Pursuit and Fatal OIS
Officers shot the man in the park after he was involved in a reported armed robbery at the...
Widow of Corrupt IL Lieutenant Wants His Pension Despite Her Pending Felony Trial
Gliniewicz, the widow of former Fox Lake police Lt. Joe Gliniewicz, has been charged with...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
Police Magazine