FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Top News

Denver PD’s Proposed Use-of-Force Policy Gets Mixed Reviews from Experts

January 24, 2017  | 

In anticipation of a series of public meetings — including the first one Tuesday — about the proposed changes to the Denver Police Department’s use-of-force policy, The Denver Post sought reviews from criminal justice experts and compared the policy to a set of recommendations endorsed this month by 11 national policing organizations.

Thus far, most of the discussion surrounding the policy has been focused on whether or not Chief Robert White should have sought community input before writing his proposed policy. Among those who have criticized him for excluding people outside the department are the Denver Police Protective Association, the union that represents police officers, and community groups such as the Colorado Latino Forum and the Denver Justice Project.

Overall, criminal justice experts who reviewed the draft policy agreed that Denver’s police department is headed in the right direction.

“To their credit, they are adjusting to shifting public opinion on police use of force,” said Joseph Schafer, chairman of the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Southern Illinois University.

Denver’s policy contains many of the recommendations included in the National Consensus Policy on Use of Force, which was released Jan. 11 and endorsed by the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Schafer said.

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Concerned former officer @ 1/25/2017 5:33 AM

I feel sorry for the officers in Denver, and quite frankly officers nationwide. The mistakes of the small minority of officers who violated the law are now impacting use of force policies that are becoming very murky.

When I was a cop/detective eons ago (retired in 2005), there was a recognition that the subject determined the amount of force necessary to affect the arrest/detention. That seems to be conspicuously absent in the new normal, political correctness and public opinion deciding how law enforcement should do their jobs.

I'm glad I retired when I did, because if I was still on the job, I would be looking for a job in corporate security. The pay is better, and while you still have people telling you how to do your job, the chances of being shot, killed, arrested, sued, etc. are almost non-existent.

Thank you for your service to all of us.

Justin Crandall @ 2/20/2017 2:43 PM

This is not a feasible use of force policy. Having to go through the steps before going to the next can be a problem. If you have to think about every step before doing the next it is a problem. You also never use warning shots.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Police Magazine