FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Top News

Justices Divided Over N.J. Police Officer's First Amendment Case

January 21, 2016  | 

Most everyone at the Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed that the First Amendment protects a public employee in a non-political job from being fired or demoted for supporting a political candidate.

But in a case alternatively described as "bizarre" and more "like a law school hypothetical," the question was what happens when the boss retaliates against an employee on the mistaken belief that the employee has asserted such support, reports the Washington Post.

By the end of the hour-long argument, it seemed clear that Paterson, N.J., police officer Jeffrey Heffernan would have had a better case if he had endorsed his friend running for mayor rather than maintained his neutrality.

He was a detective in the police department, assigned to a division headed by the police chief. His boss supported the incumbent mayor in the 2006 election; Heffernan was a close friend of former police chief Lawrence Spagnola, who was the challenger.

One day, while on his own time, Heffernan was observed by another officer picking up a yard sign at the Spagnola campaign headquarters. The sign was not for him, Heffernan explained later, but for his bed­ridden mother (Heffernan didn't even live in Paterson and was ineligible to vote.)

Nevertheless, Heffernan was demoted to patrol officer the next day and told it was because of his "overt" involvement in a political campaign.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. said that Heffernan's case might be what the court likes to call a "one-off."

"How often will it be the case that an employee will be unable to allege any expression or any association that is protected by the First Amendment?" he asked. "It seems to me quite rare."

The case is Heffernan v. City of Paterson.

Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Robert @ 1/25/2016 11:09 PM

On occasion it would be nice if the Supreme Court would look at justice vs. the letter of the law......the constitution does not live in a vacuum...and rule that the LEO was wronged; even though he was not expressly exercising his first amendment rights.
New Jersey just got to love them.

Mickey @ 4/9/2016 1:20 AM

If he was off duty, and was retaliated against, you rule in favor of the officer and order the state's attorney to charge the chief with a civil rights violation. The only way politicians get the point is to go to jail.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

West Virginia Man Accused of Battery on Officer and K-9 Partner
According to the Cabell County (WV) Sheriff's Office, a 33-year-old man is accused of...
Tennessee Officer Attacked in November Nearer to Returning to Duty
Officer B.K. Hardin of the Knoxville (TN) Police Department was directing traffic on a...
Georgia Officer Recovering from Shooting
Police say 27-year-old Tameka LaShay Simpson was in the passenger seat of a vehicle driven...

Police Magazine