FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Compression Tactical Bra - Cheata Tactical
Patented technology is designed to provide the stability of 2-3 sports bras,...

Top News

Court Blocks Order Forcing Officer to Testify at Freddie Gray Trial

January 08, 2016  | 

Prosecutors are asking an appeals court to side with the state and force an officer to testify at a colleague's trial in the death of Freddie Gray, reports the Associated Press.

The court issued a temporary order Friday that said the Officer William Porter doesn't have to testify against van driver Caesar Goodson, but the judges will reconsider now that prosecutors have responded. They did not immediately rule.


Comments (4)

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Leonard @ 1/9/2016 2:55 PM

I can't say that I disagree with this action. No one should be forced to provide testimony that could incriminate himself.

Angil @ 1/9/2016 8:53 PM

It would be in violation of his 5th Amendment Right to force him to testify. I'm sure that excuse of human breath is hoping that he will self incriminate.
How ludicrous is this chick going to be? I would plea the 5th all day long!!!!!!!!!

AZBIGDOG @ 1/10/2016 6:52 AM

So, they have already set the new trial for the officer, yet are going to force him to testify against another officer before that trial? Don't understand the courts anymore. If the office was a criminal they would bend over backwards and make the stupidest and least commonsense decisions about not forcing them to violate their rights. But wait, this is a Police Officer and he needs to testify because then they can convict more officers and him at his later trial based on information he gives at the other officers trials. So what difference is there? He is a police officer and if the slugs they have for prosecutors can violate the officers rights they can convict them and further their political careers.

AZBIGDOG @ 1/10/2016 6:52 AM

So, they have already set the new trial for the officer, yet are going to force him to testify against another officer before that trial? Don't understand the courts anymore. If the office was a criminal they would bend over backwards and make the stupidest and least commonsense decisions about not forcing them to violate their rights. But wait, this is a Police Officer and he needs to testify because then they can convict more officers and him at his later trial based on information he gives at the other officers trials. So what difference is there? He is a police officer and if the slugs they have for prosecutors can violate the officers rights they can convict them and further their political careers.

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

PA Officer Killed at Traffic Stop, Suspect at Large
Officer Brian Shaw was shot in the chest around 8:15 p.m. Friday in New Kensington, about...
Baltimore Lt. Cleared of All Administrative Charges in Freddie Gray Case
Baltimore Police Lt. Brian Rice was acquitted on administrative charges that he neglected...
WV Officer, 2 Others Shot at Burglary Call; One Dead
Police say when Patrolman S. Johnson entered the home, he encountered gunfire from a man...
Video: San Francisco Officer Donates Kidney to Stranger, Saving 9 People
Cuthbertson, a mother of a 13-year-old girl, donated a kidney this week to a stranger, and...
Charlotte Officers Cleared in Fatal Shooting of 911 Caller
Courtney Suggs and David Guerra have been on paid administrative leave since Sept. 6, when...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
Police Magazine