Ohio Court OKs Keeping Names of Officers Secret
May 11, 2012
When a Columbus (Ohio) Police officer's fatal shooting of a suspect inflamed passions in a South Side neighborhood last year, city authorities refused to identify the officer to protect him from "credible threats."
In an unrelated case, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled yesterday that law-enforcement agencies may withhold the identity of police officers who face substantiated threats of injury or death in retaliation for on-the-job actions.
The officers' constitutional right to privacy—and personal protection—supersedes Ohio’s public-records laws, the justices ruled in the appeal of a case filed by The Cincinnati Enquirer.
Read the full Columbus Dispatch story.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
Bob@Az. @ 5/12/2012 12:17 PM
Looks like OSC is finally getting the picture. About time the Courts started to protect their guardians. Good show!!
Bob @ 5/14/2012 5:19 AM
I'd like to say that this was a no-brainer, but sadly not with today's courts. Good on this judge. Chalk up one for the good guys.
DEADMAN @ 5/14/2012 4:14 PM
Show this article to your administrators and/or chief,be proactive,NOW,don't wait for one of your officers to be involved in an incident,formulate a plan of action.Work this out between department and union,DO IT NOW,it might be you.
Bruce @ 5/15/2012 12:45 PM
Let this be a model for the rest of the country. Court personnel take note and keep our public safety propfessionals safe.
Join the Discussion
Other Recent News
An Olathe (Kan.) PD motor officer scheduled to be in a presidential motorcade died Tuesday...
The Henderson (Nev.) Police Officers’ Association (HPOA) recently donated $25,000 to the...
“I saw this baby sitting on the blanket and she wasn’t moving, just looking at me,...
Fifteen years ago, the officers won a lawsuit against City of Memphis that found promotion...
A Muslim woman filed a lawsuit Thursday accusing Dearborn Heights, Mich., police of...