Ohio Court OKs Keeping Names of Officers Secret
May 11, 2012
When a Columbus (Ohio) Police officer's fatal shooting of a suspect inflamed passions in a South Side neighborhood last year, city authorities refused to identify the officer to protect him from "credible threats."
In an unrelated case, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled yesterday that law-enforcement agencies may withhold the identity of police officers who face substantiated threats of injury or death in retaliation for on-the-job actions.
The officers' constitutional right to privacy—and personal protection—supersedes Ohio’s public-records laws, the justices ruled in the appeal of a case filed by The Cincinnati Enquirer.
Read the full Columbus Dispatch story.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
Bob@Az. @ 5/12/2012 12:17 PM
Looks like OSC is finally getting the picture. About time the Courts started to protect their guardians. Good show!!
Bob @ 5/14/2012 5:19 AM
I'd like to say that this was a no-brainer, but sadly not with today's courts. Good on this judge. Chalk up one for the good guys.
DEADMAN @ 5/14/2012 4:14 PM
Show this article to your administrators and/or chief,be proactive,NOW,don't wait for one of your officers to be involved in an incident,formulate a plan of action.Work this out between department and union,DO IT NOW,it might be you.
Bruce @ 5/15/2012 12:45 PM
Let this be a model for the rest of the country. Court personnel take note and keep our public safety propfessionals safe.
Join the Discussion
Other Recent News
A 73-year-old Oklahoma volunteer deputy charged in the fatal shooting of a suspect in...
Thinking fast, Ramirez swerved his Dodge Caravan between the officer and the shooter,...
The man who hit her, 41-year-old Frank "Trey" Shephard, was shot by two Houston PD...
"This was his service gun, small and special; this is what he carried on him," said Davis,...
Los Angeles police went on a citywide tactical alert Thursday after two shootings in Palms...