Sheriff Arpaio Responds to Ruling Critical of Pink Boxers
March 29, 2012
An Arizona sheriff known for making prisoners wear pink underwear asked an appeals court Wednesday to reconsider its ruling that criticized jail officers' decision to force the colorful boxer shorts onto a mentally ill inmate who erroneously believed the officers were trying to rape him.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled in a case brought by the estate of inmate Eric Vogel against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio that the mandatory pink undergarments were a form of "punishment without legal justification." The court also said it was fair to infer that the selection of pink as the color was meant to symbolize the loss of prisoners' masculinity.
Read the full Arizona Republic story.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Rob @ 3/31/2012 8:32 PM
The pink underwear is a way to save the county money, as the crooks are less likely to steal them when they release. 9th Circuit Court want them to be given high priced name brand underwear. Don't like to wear pink, don't go to his jail.
Join the Discussion
Other Recent News
A little boy in New Jersey, who bought lunch for police officers in his town, now has his...
A driver hit and dragged Adsit while he was on duty on his bicycle in December 2014. He...
The Alameda County (CA) Sheriff’s Office has invited San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin...
Cognitive impairment, long considered a leading risk factor for Alzheimer’s and other...
The trooper's running account of the daylight pursuit challenges the belief by Harris’...