Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
In a chaotic scene on the House floor, 51 Republicans rebuffed a major last-minute effort...
Holder said that between now and his departure, probably in early March when the Senate is...
One of the steepest drops in S.I.A. occurred after the August 2014 police shooting of...
A federal appeals court on Thursday reinstated a lawsuit by an NYPD officer, who claims he...
Sources say Hochman, 52, intentionally planned to impoverish his wife and surviving...