Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
Two law enforcement officers were shot and the alleged shooter was killed Thursday when...
Far more people in the USA use heroin than a decade ago, a study from the federal...
Loretta Lynch was confirmed Thursday as the first African American woman to serve as...
The parents of Michael Brown, the 18-year-old who was shot and killed by a Ferguson police...
A sixth day of protests over the death of Freddie Gray while in custody of the Baltimore...