Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
A short standoff in Rancho Santa Fe, CA, early Saturday ended with a man being shot by...
A Patterson, LA, police officer was stabbed multiple times by a shoplifting suspect,...
Police say the officer was wearing her hijab during the altercation, and did not identify...
Police say 56-year-old Deputy Edgardo Lucero was driving the Dodge and was transported to...
Athlete Tim Tebow took a break from the sports world and paid a visit to the NYPD precinct...