Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
Bryan Johnson, 24, was found dead in his home in Millis around 3:30 a.m. on Thanksgiving,...
On one of the busiest U.S. retails days, thousands of people took to Chicago's most...
About 800 troopers — equivalent to half the force — have joined a class-action lawsuit...
These elite FBI teams are reserved for espionage, mob violence and high-priority terrorism...
Authorities said Deputy Krystal Salazar stopped to help a motorist stranded in the 11600...