Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
Deputy Sheriff Tase Sturgill suffered a fatal heart attack while he and other members of...
A Wyoming State trooper was injured Thursday afternoon in a crash near the eastern city...
A Maryland State Police Trooper was seriously injured in a crash Thursday morning while he...
Viola and her husband — who joined the NYPD in 2005 and works out of the 120th Precinct —...
A Madison, WI, police officer fatally shot a man Thursday night after the man emerged from...