Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
Bryant Brewer was on the witness stand for more than two hours Thursday before Judge...
According to the lawsuit, Redding claims Glenn brought a yellow Burmese python described...
Gov. Larry Hogan said Thursday that he will immediately shut down the decrepit Baltimore...
Knocks on the door repeatedly interrupted Illinois State Police during a heroin raid in...
More than 5,000 bystanders and passengers have been killed in police car chases since...