Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
An Oklahoma Highway Patrol trooper died of a heart attack at the age of 42 on Saturday.
The U.S. Justice Department and city of Cleveland have taken the first steps toward...
A North Carolina program of monitoring sex offenders by GPS needs closer judicial...
Arizona's governor on Monday vetoed legislation that would have kept secret for 60 days...
Four journalists arrested during last summer's Ferguson protests over the shooting death...