Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
The second-in-command at the Jefferson County (Ky.) Sheriff's Office was found dead Monday...
A U.S. Department of Justice official pledged Monday to conduct a thorough, independent...
Ignoring the chants of protesters on the block where a police officer was killed and the...
Two bodies found at separate locations Tuesday are linked to the shooting of an El Paso...
An Alton, Mo., police officer who is also a firefighter died after a crash on Monday....