Ohio Court Rules Officer's Estimate Good Enough for Speeding Conviction
June 03, 2010
Photo via Flickr.com (doug_wertman).
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a trained officer's "visual estimation" of a vehicle traveling over the posted limit is sufficient for a conviction, CNN reports.
The ruling was the second in a week—along with the U.S. Supreme Court's loosening of Miranda requirements—to favor law enforcement.
The case involved Mark Jenney and Officer Christopher Santimarino of the Copley PD. Santimarino cited Jenney for driving 79 mph in a 60 mph. A radar reading of 82 mph was tossed by the judge after Santimarino could not produce a copy of his radar-training certificate.
Local police said they would continue to use radar for traffic enforcement.
Read the full story.
Be the first to comment on this story
Other Recent News
On his first day in office President Donald J. Trump has issued a statement of support for...
The Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office posted a meme on its Facebook page Thursday...
A pair of police officers were injured and 95 protesters arrested after they smashed...
Westwego, LA, police officer Michael Louviere was shot in the head and killed while...
A 27-year-old police officer was killed Thursday night while responding to a call in...