FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Top News

INS Fugitives Reported to FBI

December 12, 2001  | 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- In a surprise crackdown, U.S. immigration officials will for the first time give the FBI names of 314,000 people who have disappeared to avoid being kicked out of the country. Local police will likely be the ones to enforce deportation.

Under the new policy, the Immigration and Naturalization Service will relay the names of such individuals to the National Crime Information Center, a criminal database maintained by the FBI and frequently consulted by local police.

Those who disappear during deportation proceedings--a relatively common, low-risk gamble in the past--could be caught during routine traffic stops or other minor brushes with law enforcement, INS officials said Wednesday. INS Commissioner James Ziglar said the new message is this: "If you don't want to be one of the guests in a detention center while we're getting your documents together, you might want to just go on home."

The almost total lack of knowledge of the whereabouts of more than 300,000 people scheduled for deportation has been a growing source of embarrassment for the INS, which has come under particular scrutiny since Sept. 11. All 19 of the suspected terrorist hijackers entered the country legally; two had overstayed their visas and a third had violated the terms of his visa.

In Congress, the agency's critics have pointed to missing immigrants as a flagrant example of INS ineptitude and a reason to reorganize the agency.

Yet even before Sept. 11, many wondered why immigration authorities did not do more about the so-called abscondees. Unlike other immigrants whose status is in question, the missing immigrants have exhausted their legal rights, or at least had the opportunity to do so.

The INS has always had the authority to pursue abscondees, but its officials have long maintained that they do not have enough resources to fully enforce immigration laws in the nation's interior.

The INS lack of knowledge "doesn't show some conspiracy to help illegal aliens," said Steven Camarota, research director at the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington group that favors stricter limits on immigration. "It just shows that immigration enforcement has been a low priority for a long period of time."

In a typical deportation proceeding, an immigration judge considers whether a person has legal status to remain in the country. If the judge rules against the immigrant, it then falls to the INS to enforce the order. Immigrants ordered deported receive a "bag and baggage" letter instructing them to pack their luggage and report to the INS for deportation.

Faced with such orders, many deportees fade into U.S. society rather than turn themselves in.

INS officials estimated Wednesday that as many as 7% to 10% of those who have avoided deportation might be caught each year through the new procedures.

But it could take as long as a year for the agency to gather the 314,000 names and enter them into the National Criminal Information Center database. And when the task is completed, the INS could be faced with a sharp increase in its already strained workload.

Most of the 314,000 abscondees are believed to have violated immigration requirements but not to be dangerous criminals. They are a subset of an estimated 6 million to 8 million unlawful immigrants, most of whom entered the country illegally.

Roughly half of the undocumented population is Mexican, concentrated heavily in Southern California. An unknown number of abscondees may have left the country on their own.

Ziglar told reporters Wednesday that he broached the idea of the policy last week with Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft, not as an anti-terrorism initiative but as a broader effort to increase the effectiveness of the INS. "The attorney general said, 'If you think this is the right thing to do, go for it,' " Ziglar recalled after an appearance at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Others were less enthusiastic, and the INS action sparked debate on what has long been a combustible issue: the role of local police agencies in the enforcement of immigration law.

"We get concerned whenever we see some kind of collaboration between local law enforcement and the INS," said Michele Waslin, a policy analyst with the National Council of La Raza. Such efforts, she said, heighten the risk that people will be deported wrongfully, and they make immigrants more fearful of police.

Jeanne Butterfield, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Assn., said ousting those who are legally subject to deportation is "a valid law enforcement goal." But the innocent should have recourse, she stressed.

"You've got a lot of people walking around out there who have no idea there was a hearing or a deportation order against them," Butterfield said.

The INS policy would also rely on local police, who in many cases have limited their cooperation with the agency. Since 1979, the Los Angeles Police Department has followed a regulation that limits cooperation with the INS. The order generally bars officers from questioning people solely because of doubts about their immigration status. It was among the first such police directives nationwide.

Although community activists charge that the LAPD has often violated the directive, such as when hundreds of Border Patrol agents worked side by side with police during the 1992 riots, the separation of police and immigration authorities has become more or less an enshrined principle in Los Angeles and other cities with large immigrant populations.

The INS initiative also is an attempt to answer complaints on Capitol Hill, where many lawmakers view the agency as overwhelmed by a vast and complex mission.

Be the first to comment on this story

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent News

Talos Ballistics Introduces Fenix Ballistics Base Layer
The Talos Ballistics NIJ IIIA Bulletproof Fenix Ballistics Base Layer (BBL) is built to...
Thorogood Introduces 3 New Built in USA Tactical Boots
Thorogood’s Built in USA Veracity GTX features Gore-Tex and Thorogood’s exclusive...
Video: CA Officers Rescue Dog Pinned Under Car on Highway
Thinking quickly, the two law enforcement officers decided to lift the car off the dog...
Video: Miami Officer Verbally Abused by Comedian During Arrest
The body-camera footage from early December — released Tuesday as part of the...
Recovering Alcoholic Officers Run the LAPD's Addiction Prevention Unit
Margolis has been on the force for 28 years; he’s got fewer than 3 left, he’ll tell you....

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
Police Magazine