FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Columns : Editorial

Self-Defense: An Eroding Right for Officers

The media, activists, agency officials, and the federal government are working hard to erode your ability to talk back and, more importantly, shoot back.

November 26, 2014  | 

The rights of law enforcement officers are under assault in this country. And no right should be dearer to you than your right to defend yourself against false claims and violent attacks.

Los Angeles. On the afternoon of Sept. 11 officers of the LAPD were called to a side street off Ventura Boulevard in the affluent neighborhood of Studio City. There, across from the offices of the Directors Guild of America, a couple was reportedly having sex in a car. The couple was questioned by the officers and patrol supervisor Sgt. Jim Parker who had arrived on scene to help. When Parker asked for identification from the female subject, she refused so he handcuffed her and detained her.

The woman's boyfriend recorded part of the incident on his cell phone. That video showing the woman crying and in cuffs was posted on YouTube. And then the couple went to the media, claiming all they had been doing was kissing in their car, that some bigot at the DGA had called in a complaint about them because she was black and he was white, and that the evil, racist LAPD had profiled them and mistreated them. What the couple didn't know was that the incident was also captured on video by people inside the DGA and by Parker's in-car video system. Once those images surfaced, their story fell apart so quickly that even African-American community activists—who are no friends of the LAPD—told them they should apologize to the cops. They've also been charged with lewd behavior, a misdemeanor.

So the starlet whose only claim to fame is a bit part in "Django Unchained" was caught having sex in public, lied about what she was doing and about her treatment by the LAPD, and the righteous prevailed. That's the end of the story.

Well, not exactly. Sgt. Jim Parker may still be fired over this incident and because of what he did in its aftermath. You see, Parker got fed up with the LAPD letting the accusations against him and his officers go unanswered. So after days of being smeared in the press, he turned over the recording from his patrol vehicle to

That video was extremely beneficial to the officers of the LAPD, as it turned public opinion about the incident in their favor. Yet, Parker faces possible dismissal for not following protocol and the chain of command.

So do officers have a right to defend themselves against false accusations in the press? I leave the answer to you.

Seattle. Late last month a federal judge ruled that a group of officers from the Seattle Police Department can't sue the city and the judge who wrote the department's use-of-force policy under a federal consent decree. The officers may appeal, but they probably don't have a chance to prevail. Let's face it, the deck is stacked against them.

So do you have a right to defend yourself against a restrictive use-of-force policy that you believe to be unconstitutional? Evidently not.

Ferguson. At press time, it's looking more and more like Officer Darren Wilson's account of what happened on Saturday Aug. 9 when he shot and killed Michael Brown, namely that Brown assaulted him and tried to take his duty pistol, can be proved by evidence.

But it's also looking more and more like, regardless of the evidence, the Department of Justice will not abide any finding by the St. Louis County grand jury other than charges of manslaughter or even murder against the Ferguson officer.

The day after the official autopsy of Brown leaked to the press, the DOJ whined to the same press that the leaks of such information are "irresponsible." And out-going Attorney General Eric Holder told Justice Department lawyers that he was "exasperated by the selective flow of information out of Missouri."

It seems the AG is very concerned that the leaks are prejudicing the case in Wilson's favor. Which is just rich, considering that Holder has done everything he possibly can to prejudge the case against Wilson and has basically let the American people know through his actions that he won't be satisfied with anything short of a guilty verdict against the officer. Which means it's a pretty safe bet that even if the grand jury fails to indict, the DOJ will haul Wilson into the dock on civil rights charges. (Note: This column was written before a St. Louis County grand jury decided Officer Wilson's shooting of Brown was justified.)

So do you as a local law enforcement officer have a right to defend yourself against the federal government in controversial use-of-force cases? Yes, legally you do. But make no mistake, they will come after you with everything they have.

Comments (7)

Displaying 1 - 7 of 7

plato's playdough @ 11/27/2014 7:03 PM

Cities should start holding reporters personally liable for any unsubstantiated reports that lead to escalation of force that results in any lawsuit against the city, and for any damage to property due to rioting, or damage to city property due to such NEGLIGENCE of fiduciary duty of reporting properly vetted information.

The Mindfrick Media started this tactic, empowering litiginous thugs to attack the "deep pockets" of city budgets. Fire back.

bob /retired leo @ 11/29/2014 8:00 AM

Once the media gets their paws on a story like Furgeson they become parasites.They just keep feeding from the story and latch on to the story and continually report it over and over and over again until its so redundant you're sick and disgusted of listening to it, like this run on sentence. The grand jury had their say, so let it go. Off. Wilson is justified with use of force. Time to end the parasitic coverage and move on to fresh news. The aforementioned story has had the life sucked out of it and its old and dying. Now they want all law officers to wear cams. Why not have the criminals and skells wear cams so we can see them working and plotting their criminal activities. I see from TV that every civilian on the street knows the cops job better then her does. So why don't they dawn a uniform and try the job and help their communities . Naaa, its easier to complain and riot and burn down hard working citizens businesses and damage your community.

Tom Ret @ 11/29/2014 10:32 AM

It is beyond time for the police agencies to ban together in one voice so that the likes of Holder don't destroy the profession. If the people will not support their police, then the job is not worth doing.

S.S. @ 12/1/2014 8:39 AM

Sad but true, I've been on almost 20 years, and it's ridiculous to me that the pendulum is swinging further and further to the left. Violence towards police officers is gaining momentum. Even to the point where the president and the attorney general are doing everything they can to have the officer indicted for murder. No matter how much evidence mounts against that p.o.s. brown it doesnt matter. They won't be satisfied til the officer is charged. Good luck Officer Wilson you have a nation of law enforcement behind you.

Leonard @ 12/12/2014 9:02 AM

Police tactics should be under constant police scrutiny. Police have the authority to use force to include deadly force against it's citizens. Police have always been given the benefit of the doubt in excessive force claims, but thankfully, though the use of dash cameras and citizen cell phones, the public has seen too many instances where a police report doesn't match the events that occurred on video. Or cases where the use of force wasn't clearly justified, or citizens being arrested on trumped up charges and worst of all, use of deadly force where it wasn't called for. I'm pleased to see that police is finally getting the honest scrutiny that has been missing for too long in this country. The more...the better!!

Self Defence Scotland @ 12/14/2014 10:33 PM

I JUST discovered your site, and I’m already addicted.Hi i have read your post and i think it's usefull.Thanks for the sharing this website. it is very useful professional knowledge.<a href="">Krav Maga</a>

Krav Maga Scotland @ 12/19/2014 9:29 PM

Nice Blog!! Great Post !! Like your Blog and your ideas and i think its beneficial for us and i keep to visit your blog regularly because i got lot of information through you blog....<a href="">Krav Maga Scotland</a>

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Protection Against Airborne Toxins
Officers will continue to come into contact with extremely strong and potentially lethal...
Responding to Domestic Disturbances
A domestic disturbance call can involve anything from a verbal dispute to a homicide. So...
Canines Bring Comfort to Victims
The goal whenever a comfort dog is used during a crisis is to "calm people down then push...

Police Magazine