FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Columns : Editorial

Airsoft Tragedy in Sonoma County

The shooting of a boy carrying a replica AK-47 is horrible, but so is the persecution of the deputy who killed him thinking that gun was real.

November 04, 2013  |  by - Also by this author

Last month in Sonoma County, Calif., in an area known as Southwest Santa Rosa, a 13-year-old boy walked down the street. He was carrying a friend’s airsoft gun.

At about 3:15 p.m., the boy was spotted by deputies of the Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department. Seeing what they believed to be an AK-47 in the subject’s hands and knowing they were in a neighborhood plagued by gangs, the deputies called for back up, parked their car about 30 feet from the subject, got out, took cover behind its doors, drew their service weapons, and told the subject to drop the gun.

What happened next, according to police, is that the subject turned around and the muzzle of the “AK” swung toward the deputies. One of the deputies, Erick Gelhaus, fired eight shots at the subject.

Andy Lopez was hit seven times. He was pronounced dead at the scene. And it was only after handcuffing him that the deputies discovered that “AK” was actually an airsoft replica. The barrel that was supposed to carry the telltale orange plastic tip was broken.

Lopez’s family is grief-stricken, angry, and lawyered up. Dep. Gelhaus is not commenting, but it doesn’t take much empathy to know he is suffering. The community is holding vigils and protest marches and demanding “justice.” And the Sonoma SD is doing all it can to explain the incident and defuse the situation, which is under investigation by the Santa Rosa Police Department and the FBI.

But the situation can’t be defused. Lopez was a Latino in a predominantly impoverished and immigrant neighborhood. He was killed by a white deputy. And the situation is likely to get worse when the public learns that legally the shooting was justified.

Dep. Gelhaus is an Iraq War veteran, a 24-year veteran of the Sonoma SD, and has testified as an expert on gang activity. So he’s had plenty of experience with the AK. And what he saw in the boy’s hand that day was to him an AK, not an airsoft gun. He believed in that split-second that he was facing a semi-automatic or even automatic rifle with the power to shred his patrol car, punch through his and his partner’s body armor, and kill civilians who happened to be downrange. So he fired. And he kept firing until the “threat” was down.

Under Graham v. Connor that is going to be a justified shooting, although a terribly tragic one. And probably every investigator on this case knows it. But still the FBI has been asked by somebody up the chain (Holder?) to come in and probe whether the case involves a violation of Lopez’s civil rights.

And the local second-guessers are having a field day.

Some, including the local newspaper editorial board, are saying that Gelhaus should have noted the boy’s age and decided to use less-lethal force instead. Maybe they know of some less-lethal tool that individual patrol officers carry on their person that has a range of 10 yards and is effective against someone who is wielding a 7.62 x 39mm rifle, but I don’t and I’ve been privy to developments in the field of law enforcement weaponry for 12 years now.

As for Lopez’s age, since when is a 13-year-old boy carrying an AK any less dangerous than a full-grown adult with such a weapon? Ever heard of preteen gang members who do the shooting for their cliques because it's hard for the law to prosecute them? Ever heard of 10-year-old child soldiers who murder, maim, and rape while carrying AKs?

The sad truth is that sometimes officers make justified mistakes based on the circumstances at the time. I’m certain that given the facts now known, Gelhaus would tell you he wished he hadn’t fired. But I can also say with some certainty that given the same circumstances and information presented at the time of the incident, he would shoot again.

Which is what the veteran deputy will likely say to the investigators or at any grand jury hearing or trial that may occur. “Given the totality of the circumstances at the time, I would not do anything differently.”

That’s going to be a hard thing for the local newspaper, the ACLU, the Southwest Santa Rosa community, and the family of Andy Lopez to hear. But it’s the law of the land. Because of the circumstances known at the time, Lopez was perceived as a deadly “threat.”

Don’t believe me? Then ask yourself what might have happened if the subject had been a gang member, the AK had been real, and the deputy hadn’t taken action. 

FBI Investigating Calif. Airsoft Shooting

Calif. Deputy Who Shot Airsoft-Carrying Teen Identified

Calif. Deputy Kills Boy who Brandished Airsoft AK-47

Attorney: Calif. Dep. Absolutely Believed AK-47 was Real

Tags: Airsoft, Sonoma County (Calif.) Sheriff, Toy Guns


Comments (5)

Displaying 1 - 5 of 5

donut_plz @ 11/5/2013 4:24 PM

What if he had been a gang member? Do we know he was or wasnt for sure?
Ive been in the same shoes as this deputy. He did the right thing based on what he knew. It is a good shoot. It sucks that it happened.

tpd223 @ 11/5/2013 8:02 PM

I will note that the "kids" who shot up their own school in Jonesboro Ark. were 11 and 13 years old, yet that did not stop them from being able to successfully plan and execute a complex ambush/mass shooting attack.

West Memphis found out in no uncertain terms what happens when officers do not react in time to a 16 year old with an AK.

Andy @ 11/10/2013 9:22 AM

Come on if you know what a real ak rifle looks like cant you tell the diffrence

Andy @ 11/10/2013 9:31 AM

IT is okay i forgive you for what you have done

Andy @ 11/10/2013 9:32 AM

It is okay i forgive you

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Police Product Test: Forum Industries Patrol Jacket
Forum Industries is doing some wonderful things with Gore fabrics and its latest line of...
Oakley's PRIZM Shooting Lenses
Performance eyewear manufacturer Oakley has long been known for consulting with its...
The Human Element
The one element that has remained unchanged in our ever-growing technological environment,...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of over 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine