FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Columns : The Federal Voice

Congress' Super Failure

Across the board cuts to federal law enforcement spending will help no one but the world’s worst criminals and terrorists.

January 09, 2012  |  by Jon Adler

CC_Flickr: Hey Paul 

The congressional Super Committee's deadline of Nov. 23, has come and gone, and now federal law enforcement may face the harmful impact of sequestration and "across the board" budget cuts. Unfortunately, there is also a negative derivative impact that the American public may have to endure: a reduction in their protection.

Prior to the Nov. 23 deadline, the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) released an illustration to members of the Super Committee to depict the dire consequences of "across the board" cuts. Specifically, any reduction in the federal law enforcement ranks would result in an increase in criminal activity, including terrorism. Criminals thrive on a sense of rational opportunity and will fully exploit any reduction in law enforcement personnel and resources. Federal law enforcement has already been weakened by hiring freezes and increasing rates of attrition. So dangerous criminals will not take pause to accommodate an uncompromising Congress.

While certain members of Congress hope to furlough government workers as a remedy for the deficit, they continue to ignore the societal cost of ignoring dangerous criminals. The same failed logic has impacted state and local law enforcement as well. Police officers are being laid off due to the short-sightedness of many local and state elected officials.

The platform for our democracy is built on the unwavering foundation provided by law enforcement officers. When politicians chisel away at that foundation, they jeopardize the safety and sanctity of everything it supports. Federal law enforcement officers cannot protect our citizens from suspected terrorists, drug trafficking cartel members, and sex predator fugitives if they're placed on furlough.

In addition to the essential protections federal law enforcement officers provide, they also bring in a substantial amount of funds via their respective asset-forfeiture or recovery programs. Concurrent with the money federal law enforcement officers bring back to our government, they cost the government less than 1% of the overall budget. Yet somehow, by way of their baffling budget debate, the Super Committee spent a lot time focusing on the cost of the government workforce. While certain members of Congress continue to blame the deficit on the cost of the government workforce, federal law enforcement has been reduced to an anonymous feather on the back of a duck treading water in a shrinking barrel.

This year the Department of Justice law enforcement components seized criminal assets that resulted in the government recouping $1.6 billion in forfeiture money. The Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector General recovered $15.5 billion from both criminal and civil investigations. Investigations conducted by the Defense Criminal Investigative Service yielded over $20 billion in recovered funds for the government. Unfortunately, the congressional budget debates have not recognized the value of these accomplishments.

Another casualty of this shameful budget debate is the multi-agency task force(s), arguably the most effective law enforcement concept for combating terrorism and organized crime. When Congress reduces funding for federal law enforcement, it is severing the means for task forces to fund state and local participation. This can cause irreparable harm to task forces' ability to pursue dangerous criminals. Any member of Congress who defines task force money as "waste, fraud, and abuse" should be institutionalized.  

Irrespective of the Super Committee's failure to come up with $1.2 trillion in cuts, Congress continues to appropriate billions of dollars in foreign aid. This includes billions to train foreign law enforcement personnel, when federal law enforcement endures a drought in training funding. Given the unrefuted principle that protecting our citizens and institutions is our government's top priority, how does Congress justify this spending?

Absent any legislative chicanery, the Super Committee's failure will result in the automatic "across the board" cuts going into effect in January 2013. In spite of that dire forecast, FLEOA will continue to advocate for a legislative "carve-out" to protect federal law enforcement funding.

In the future, Super Committee members should consider the following: When children swing blindly at a beehive hoping for honey, all they walk away with are bee stings.

Tags: FLEOA, U.S. Congress, Budget Cuts


Comments (2)

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

Deadman @ 1/11/2012 12:28 AM

How can we save money for the department and keep more officers working,let's see!
1).Everybody in the department,take a twenty percent cut in pay and benefits.
2)Take away the take home cars for the brass and detectives.
3)Unplug the laptops and have each officer going out on road check one out and back in at end of shift.
4)Stop fudging on court time and over time,turn in accurate figures.
5).Stop destroying confiscated weapons and then buying new ones,if you're destroying a glock and you use a glock,it's a no-brainer ,check other departments ,see if they want them.
6).Stop voting for the same clowns that cause layoffs,either city officials or union people.
7).Solicit businesses to purchase equipment.
8).Stop buying new toys,just to have them,grow up.

TripWire @ 1/11/2012 8:12 AM

They will cut law enforcement yet still fund Sen. Reid's "Cowboy Poetry Fair". Unbelievable waste and corruption, yet they still get voted in. Why? Apathy among the population. Until you get people to understand that a bloated federal government is a threat to this country then we will keep getting what we have been getting. The states know what they each need and they do it for the most part within their budgets (except California), so why do we as a country keep allowing the power to be centered in DC?

Join the Discussion





POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.

Other Recent Stories

Beyond CIT
When it comes to the mentally ill, many police departments are finding themselves...
Inside the Mind of a Cold Case Detective
The first thing a good investigator, especially a cold case investigator, needs to know is...
Concerns of Police Survivors Healing Hearts
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.) welcomes with open arms those who have suffered...

Get Your FREE Trial Issue and Win a Gift! Subscribe Today!
Yes! Please rush me my FREE TRIAL ISSUE of POLICE magazine and FREE Officer Survival Guide with tips and tactics to help me safely get out of 10 different situations.

Just fill in the form to the right and click the button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.

If POLICE does not satisfy you, just write "cancel" on the invoice and send it back. You'll pay nothing, and the FREE issue is yours to keep. If you enjoy POLICE, pay only $25 for a full one-year subscription (12 issues in all). Enjoy a savings of nearly 60% off the cover price!

Offer valid in US only. Outside U.S., click here.
It's easy! Just fill in the form below and click the red button to receive your FREE Trial Issue.
First Name:
Last Name:
Rank:
Agency:
Address:
City:
State:
  
Zip Code:
 
Country:
We respect your privacy. Please let us know if the address provided is your home, as your RANK / AGENCY will not be included on the mailing label.
E-mail Address:

Police Magazine