FREE e-Newsletter
Important News - Hot Topics
Get them Now!

Autonomous Robots Prevent Crime

Ask The Expert

Stacy Dean Stephens

VP Marketing & Sales

The Law Officer's Pocket Manual - Bloomberg BNA
This handy 4" x 6" spiral-bound manual offers examples showing how rules are...

Cover Story

Station Attacks

Criminals who hate cops know that you tend to let your guard down when you’re on your home turf.

May 16, 2011  |  by - Also by this author

Regardless of assault-prompts, target selection is emblematic of the same linear thinking Willie Sutton displayed in explaining why he robbed banks: Because that's where the money is. Why do aspiring cop killers attack police stations? Because that's where the cops are.

Mitigating the Threat

Law enforcement personnel are routinely trained in tactical protocol designed for a variety of field situations. Mitigating the threats posed to them in-house has to be a multi-pronged approach, with consideration given to the following concerns:

  • Architectural barriers
  • Safe practices
  • Identifying threats
  • Establishing a will to survive
  • Protecting the home turf

The idea of fortifying stations or precincts will doubtlessly find its detractors. After all, for the last decade or so emphasis has been placed on creating client-friendly venues for the public to interact with their protectors. Some administrators would argue that lobbies and parking lots need be accessible to the public and that the odds of a police station coming under attack are remote.

But the odds are not as favorable as they once were. While a vast majority of police, sheriff, and federal offices will not come under attack anytime soon, it is increasingly likely that more will. Nor can an agency take any comfort in having been "pre-disastered."

A few years before Moore launched his assault on Detroit's Precinct 6, a suspect entered the department's 9th Precinct and opened fire.

A former Detroit 6th Precinct officer notes that officers working the desk area have historically been at an architectural disadvantage. "When sitting at the desk, you can't see persons entering the station below their waist," he says. "As they get closer to the desk the view gets worse. I've worked that desk many times and I can't tell you how many times there were officers working behind the desk with no weapon and with no body armor. When I got stuck working the desk, I tried to keep my eyes on persons entering the station, but it was impossible to watch everyone. I always knew something like this was possible and that we were at a disadvantage."

Don Alwes of the National Tactical Officers Association believes that the law enforcement community needs to show greater initiative in addressing such threats.

"Police departments should take these things more seriously than they do," Alwes says. "You've got to be able to prevent someone trying to attack. You have to be able to defend against them by establishing security measures against them."

To that end, Sgt. Eren Stephens of the Detroit PD Public Relations Office notes that the department is looking at a variety of possible chances to enhance officer safety within and without its precincts. Other agencies have tightened security both inside and outside their facilities, employing private security to monitor police parking lots and parking structures. Video surveillance systems give inside personnel a means of monitoring people before they cross lobby thresholds while metal detectors can detect threats without officers having to physically engage subjects. Smoked-glass and ballistic-resistant windows offer additional layers of protection. (See "Fortifying Police Stations.")

CONTINUED: Station Attacks «   Page 2 of 4   »

Comments (1)

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1

Morning Eagle @ 5/17/2011 1:46 AM

Here is another very timely and informative article from Dean. This is a vulnerability that should not be ignored or put on the planning back burner for "someday." Given the technologies available today for enhancing facility and personnel security using unobtrusive devices and practices, (to placate those who object to "creating a fortress atmosphere) there is no valid reason for failure to implement more stringent protective measures as quickly as budgets will permit. But even without immediate equipment or structural upgrades there are many things that could be done to correct the tendencies to go into condition white just because one is in the office surroundings. The article alludes to the growing terorrist threat from groups south of the border. We already know Hezbollah and other middle east organizations are working with the drug/human smugglers in Mexico and other countries and are getting their agents into our country mixed in with the flood of more benign invaders. Ignore or dismiss this potential source of attack at your peril. It is very real and high on their priority list will be disrupting law enforcement and other EMS responders. They may be evil but they are not stupid.

It is a no-brainer that communications/dispatch centers and personnel (mostly unarmed) must be obscured and protected from the view and hearing of the public. If impracticle to move to an inner part of the facility, at the very least install smoked or one-way-view bullet proof glass. Costly? Perhaps, but not as costly as losing your commo in an emergency would be.

Take it from an old timer, always be armed and mentally ready because you just never know, not even when you are in the office.

Join the Discussion

POLICE Magazine does not tolerate comments that include profanity, personal attacks or antisocial behavior (such as "spamming" or "trolling"). This and other inappropriate content or material will be removed. We reserve the right to block any user who violates this, including removing all content posted by that user.
Police Magazine